L. O'toole

Statistics and Probability · 2001–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 13 researchers and is trusted by 25 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom L. O'toole trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Rajeev Dehejia
  2. K. Meier
  3. Jeffrey A. Smith
  4. Marco Caliendo
  5. George Farkas
  6. Petra E. Todd
  7. J. Conway
  8. Sabine Kopeinig
  9. C. Lance
  10. Alisa Hicklin

Who trusts L. O'toole overall

  1. Morten Jakobsen
  2. Rhys Andrews
  3. Thomas Anning-Dorson
  4. George A. Boyne
  5. K. Meier
  6. R. Jensen
  7. T. Ashikali
  8. W. Jacobson
  9. R. M. Walker
  10. N. V. van Loon

Papers from L. O'toole's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. O'toole trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Practical propensity score matching: a reply to Smith and Todd
  2. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching (Social Science Research Network)
  3. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance
  5. What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research
  6. Method Effects, Measurement Error, and Substantive Conclusions
  7. Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects
  8. On the validity of subjective measures of company performance
  9. Generalizations about Using Value-Added Measures of Teacher Quality
  10. Public Service Performance: Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration

Their papers