Executive Coaching: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

By D. Feldman, Melenie J. Lankau. 2005

486 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb413cb2652e6218638a5873e0b598f38ad6f8b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Building successful leadership coaching relationships: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program (2010, unknown): “Research is needed to understand why coaching works, including how to identify and build successful coach client relationships (Feldman & Lankau, 2005; O’Broin & Palmer, 2006).”
Personality And Leadership Composition in Top Management Teams: Implications For Organizational Effectiveness (2014, methodology): “…when provided to the TMT as a whole, might be used to raise awareness about how team composition influences interactions in the TMT and provides the team with ideas about how to maximize effectiveness given the existing composition of the TMT (Feldman & Lankau, 2005; Hackman & Wageman, 2005).”
A systematic review of executive coaching outcomes: Is it the journey or the destination that matters the most? (2018, background): “Among the most notable efforts to review the field are the early qualitative reviews by Kampa-Kokesch and Anderson (2001) and Feldman and Lankau (2005) and the more recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses by Ely et al. (2010), Theeboom et al. (2014), Jones et al. (2016) and Grover and Furnham…”
Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context (2014, unknown): “To date, several good literature reviews, rather than empirical reviews, have been published (Brock, 2008; Feldman & Lankau, 2005; Grant, 2001; Grant & Cava-nagh, 2004; Grant, Passmore, et al., 2010; Kampa-Kok-esch & Anderson, 2001; Passmore & Fillery-Travis, 2011).”
Challenges for the Theory and Practice of Business Coaching (2016, result): “These conclusions are consistent with those of previous reviews (Ely et al., 2010; Feldmen & Lankau, 2005; Joo, 2005; Passmore & Fillery-Travis, 2011; Passmore & Gibbes, 2007).”
Understanding the factors that determine workplace coaching effectiveness: a systematic literature review (2018, methodology): “Second, unlike previous literature reviews (e.g., Feldman & Lankau, 2005; Grant, Passmore, Cavanagh, & Parker, 2010; Joo, 2005; Passmore & Fillery-Travis, 2011; Peterson, 2010), we adopt a truly systematic methodology by closely following established principles and recommendations for conducting a…”
Leadership coaching, leader role-efficacy, and trust in subordinates. A mixed methods study assessing leadership coaching as a leadership development tool (2014, unknown): “It is a formal one-on-one relationship that involves counseling about work-related issues with the purpose of improving their leadership effectiveness (Ely et al., 2010; Feldman & Lankau, 2005; Stajkovic & Luthans, 1998).”
Why interpersonal dominance and affiliation matter: an interaction analysis of the coach-client relationship (2013, background): “…supports the notion that coaches should try to adapt their interpersonal behaviour to the client’s characteristics in order to establish an ideal coaching relationship and to attain coaching success (e.g. Feldman & Lankau, 2005; McKenna & Davis, 2009; Scoular & Linley, 2006; Wycherley & Cox, 2008).”
Evaluating the effectiveness of executive coaching: beyond ROI? (2009, methodology): “Whatever design is implemented, a concerted effort to employ rigorous evaluation procedures is needed (Feldman & Lankau, 2005).”
A critical review of executive coaching research: a decade of progress and what's to come (2011, background): “They were subsequently explored in a review (Feldman & Lankau, 2005).”
Coaching leaders in middle and executive management: goals, performance, buy‐in (2007, background): “Although the needs of participants at these levels may differ, most leaders could benefit from focused coaching and it is important to consider the ways in which such benefit can be optimized for managers at both levels ( Feldman and Lankau, 2005”
Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success? (2014, background): “The general consensus at this time was that, although more research was needed, the literature supported the notion that coaching was indeed an effective change methodology (for reviews, see Feldman & Lankau, 2005; Grant et al., 2010; Greif, 2007; Passmore & Gibbes, 2007).”
A Qualitative Study of Performance Leadership and Management in Elite Sport (2011, methodology): “Indeed, the techniques used in executive coaching (Feldman & Lankau, 2005; Kampa-Kokesch & Anderson, 2001; Passmore & Gibbes, 2007) will likely transfer well to performance leadership and management consultancy in elite sport.”