Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success?

By Adam M. Grant. 2014

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60f85c82605ea1eaefec2a045a5320069623021b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. Yvonne D. Burger
3. Per-Olof Eriksson
4. E. D. Haan
5. Sharon K. Parker
6. Michaella Cavanagh
7. M. Bolino
8. Gordon B. Spence

In Clinical Psychology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. Yvonne D. Burger
3. E. D. Haan
4. Per-Olof Eriksson
5. N. Bellé
6. M. J. Pedersen
7. Michaella Cavanagh
8. Gordon B. Spence

In Social Psychology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. Yvonne D. Burger
3. Per-Olof Eriksson
4. E. D. Haan
5. N. Bellé
6. Sharon K. Parker
7. M. Bolino
8. Sabine Sonnentag

Citations in the corpus

• A large-scale study of executive and workplace coaching: The relative contributions of relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy. (2016, background): “Grant (2014a) compared four aspects of the coach–coachee relationship to investigate which was more related to specific measures of coaching success.”