Why interpersonal dominance and affiliation matter: an interaction analysis of the coach-client relationship

By Patrizia M. Ianiro, Carsten C. Schermuly, Simone Kauffeld. 2013

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c40664ecddab324475c677b744141fc2ec10bee8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Simone Kauffeld
2. Sina Gessnitzer
3. Adam M. Grant
4. Sharon K. Parker
5. Michaella Cavanagh
6. M. Bolino
7. Gordon B. Spence
8. N. Bellé

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. Sina Gessnitzer
3. Simone Kauffeld
4. Michaella Cavanagh
5. Gordon B. Spence
6. L. S. Green

In Social Psychology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. Simone Kauffeld
3. Sina Gessnitzer
4. N. Bellé
5. Sharon K. Parker
6. M. Bolino
7. Sabine Sonnentag
8. Francesca Gino

Citations in the corpus

• The Working Alliance in Coaching (2015, background): “Only a few exceptions in coaching research have applied methods to investigate behavior (Greif, 2010; Ianiro & Kauffeld, 2014; Ianiro et al., 2013, 2014) and, to our knowledge, only one of them has considered the working alliance.”
• Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success? (2014, methodology): “In line with past work (e.g., de Haan et al., 2013; Jowett, Kanakoglou, & Passmore, 2012), Ianiro et al. (2013) found interpersonal compatibility of coach and coachee was beneficial in terms of both relationship quality and goal attainment.”