Evaluating the effectiveness of executive coaching: beyond ROI?

By K. P. De Meuse, Guangrong Dai, Robert J. Lee. 2009

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d17d65a4b32dce7baba1f347e44bfbfe7632d979

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. D. Gray
3. Anna Blackman
4. G. Moscardo
5. A. Fillery-Travis
6. J. Passmore
7. Michaella Cavanagh
8. Sharon K. Parker

In Education

1. A. Fillery-Travis
2. D. Gray
3. Anna Blackman
4. Adam M. Grant
5. J. Passmore
6. G. Moscardo

In Social Psychology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. D. Gray
3. Anna Blackman
4. G. Moscardo
5. A. Fillery-Travis
6. J. Passmore
7. N. Bellé
8. Sharon K. Parker

Citations in the corpus

• A critical review of executive coaching research: a decade of progress and what's to come (2011, background): “The impact has varied from study to study, but a work has started on beginning the results of multiple studies together through a meta-analysis (De Meuse et al., 2009).”
• The Efficacy of Executive Coaching in Times of Organisational Change (2014, background): “This view is not without its critics (Laske, 2004; De Meuse et al., 2009; Grant, 2012).”
• Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context (2014, unknown): “To our knowledge only De Meuse, Dai, and Lee (2009) conducted a quantitative review.”
• Challenges for the Theory and Practice of Business Coaching (2016, background): “De Meuse et al. (2009) and Ely et al. (2010) offer more details on suggested methodologies.”