PROCEDURAL INJUSTICE, VICTIM PRECIPITATION, AND ABUSIVE SUPERVISION

By Bennett J. Tepper, M. Duffy, Christine A. Henle, Lisa Schurer Lambert. 2006

676 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc98252e356e700a5cd2a4b82b3b56835623a766

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Abusive Supervision and Employee Emotional Exhaustion (2009, background): “Although some studies have examined the role of justice perception as a precursor of abusive supervision (Aryee, Chen, Sun, & Debrah, 2007; Tepper et al., 2006), we found no study that investigated how subordinates’ dispositional factors may influence the way they perceive abusive supervision.”
Supervisors' exceedingly difficult goals and abusive supervision: The mediating effects of hindrance stress, anger, and anxiety (2014, neutral): “Studies that have explicitly examined predictors of supervisor abuse have mainly focused on contextual factors, such as organizational injustice (e.g., Aryee et al., 2007; Tepper et al., 2006), psychological contract violation (e.”
Abusive Supervision and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure (2008, background): “Given the reported influence of victims’ characteristics on their experienced abusive supervision (Tepper et al., 2006), it is unlikely that supervisors will uniformly abuse their subordinates.”
My Family Made Me Do It: A Cross-Domain, Self-Regulatory Perspective on Antecedents to Abusive Supervision (2016, background): “Conversely, Aryee et al. (2007) and Tepper et al. (2006) took a displaced aggression perspective and found that supervisors who experienced injustices, workplace constraints, or psychological contract violations were more likely to abuse their subordinates.”
Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes (2007, background): “Additionally, Tepper et al. (2001) reported that conscientious individuals responded to abusive supervision in a more constructive manner than those with low conscientiousness.”
A Model of Injustice, Abusive Supervision, and Negative Affect (2013, result): “As two exceptions, Tepper et al. (2006) and Restubog et al. (2011), together with their colleagues, supported models of abusive supervision that incorporated affective mechanisms to explain behavior.”
From Ineffectiveness to Destruction: A Qualitative Study on the Meaning of Negative Leadership (2009, background): “Closely related to this line of research, Tepper and his colleagues (e.g., Tepper, 2000; 2007; Tepper et al., 2006; Zellars et al., 2002) have summarized different approaches like undermining (Duffy et al.”
How Abusive Supervision Affects Workplace Deviance: A Moderated-Mediation Examination of Aggressiveness and Work-Related Negative Affect (2016, background): “8 billion (Tepper et al. 2006).”
In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior (2010, background): “, authoritarian leadership behaviors) will be more strongly related to abusive supervision when dispositional characteristics of the subordinate make them a more vulnerable target (Tepper et al., 2006).”