Commitment, Procedural Fairness, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Multifoci Analysis

By James J. Lavelle, J. Brockner, M. Konovsky, Kenneth H. Price, Amy B. Henley, Aakash Taneja, Vishnu Vinekar. 2009

285 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86a9b51b3c446941eae6b41fb1f39f598032135d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Effects of team and organizational commitment – A longitudinal study (2010, background): “…present study, it may be inferred that team-related behavior (e.g., altruism toward colleagues) should be predicted better by team-related attitudes (e.g., team commitment) than by organization-related attitudes (e.g., organizational commitment; cf. Lavelle et al., 2009; Riketta & Van Dick, 2005).”
Leadership empowering behaviour, psychological empowerment, organisational citizenship behaviours and turnover intention in a manufacturing division (2015, background): “Globalisation presents leaders with unique challenges and opportunities (Van Dierendonck & Dijkstra, 2012; Youssef & Luthans, 2012), which relies on employees’ positive attitudes (Lavelle et al., 2009) towards their leaders’ behaviour.”
Measuring Justice and Fairness (2015, background): “Thus, organization-focused justice might be used to predict organization-targeted citizenship behavior, with supervisor-focused justice predicting supervisor-targeted citizenship behavior (Horvath & Andrews, 2007; Karriker & Williams, 2009; Lavelle et al., 2009; Liao & Rupp, 2005; Rupp & Cropanzano,”
Dual commitment in the organization: Effects of the interplay of team and organizational commitment on employee citizenship behavior, efficacy beliefs, and turnover intentions (2017, background): “Drawing on the target similarity principle, Lavelle et al. (2009) argued against an augmentation effect.”
Taking a Multifoci Approach to the Study of Justice, Social Exchange, and Citizenship Behavior: The Target Similarity Model† (2007, background): “This has been referred to as intraunit justice by Cropanzano, Li, and James (2007), and there are a small number of studies suggesting that coworkers are a viable source of justice whose influence is worthy of our research attention (e.g., Branscombe, Spears, Ellemer, & Doosje, 2002; Donovan, Drasgo”
Applying Uncertainty Management Theory To Employee Voice Behavior: An Integrative Investigation (2012, background): “organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), but their studies have focused on the effects of only one or two facets of the justice perception (e.g., Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, Porter, & Ng, 2001; De Cremer, Brebels, & Sedikides, 2008; Lavelle et al., 2009; Tepper & Taylor, 2003).”
Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. (2013, background): “…social exchange qual- ity in justice–behavior relationships (Aryee et al., 2002; Aryee & Chay, 2001; Karriker & Williams, 2009; Konovsky & Pugh, 1994; Lavelle et al., 2009; Masterson et al., 2000; Moorman et al., 1998; Rupp & Cropanzano, 2002; Wayne et al., 2002), those studies leave a number of…”
Ethical Leadership: Assessing the Value of a Multifoci Social Exchange Perspective (2012, unknown): “We focus exclusively on affective commitment, not because it is the most widely studied forms of commitment (Lavelle et al. 2008) but because it is most closely related, theoretically, to social exchange and related variables (see Eisenberger et al. 1986; Van Knippenberg and Sleebos 2006; Gautam et…”