Measuring Justice and Fairness

By J. Colquitt, J. B. Rodell. 2015

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b39a0ce47e1c112828e3b7caefdfdf10259b2ab9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies (2017, background): “Historically, event-based justice perceptions have been organized into multiple dimensions, such as distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice (for a thorough review, see Colquitt & Rodell, 2015).”
Justice, Fairness, and Employee Reactions (2015, background): “Following Colquitt & Rodell (2015), we define justice as the perceived adherence to rules that reflect appropriateness in decision contexts.”
Is Consistently Unfair Better than Sporadically Fair? An Investigation of Justice Variability and Stress (2017, background): “…downstream from the justice dimensions, and are the proximal mechanism by which justice dimensions influence important justice-related outcomes (Colquitt & Rodell, 2015; see also Ambrose & Schminke, 2009; Kim & Leung, 2007); and (c) large-scale differences across the different dimensions are…”
Understanding the Disparate Behavioral Consequences of LMX Differentiation: The Role of Social Comparison Emotions (2018, background): “…recommendations to focus on overall justice (e.g., Ambrose, Wo, & Griffith, 2015; Colquitt, 2012) because it is the key theoretical mechanism that explains why justice rule adherence (e.g., distributive, procedural, informational, and interpersonal) influences outcomes (Colquitt & Rodell, 2015).”
Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions (2021, background): “…papers along with relevant theories including the sti-mulus-organism-response theory (Mehrabian & Russell, 1974), the contextual factors framework (Petter et al., 2013), and the organisational justice theory (Colquitt & Rodell, 2015), we extract eight important, theoretical, and relevant concepts.”