Improving the creativity of organizational work groups

By Leigh Thompson. 2003

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/742131e4b64d9a5a15979a5aa5e0819af6801909

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Amy E. Randel
2. Kimberly S. Jaussi
3. Tim Basadur
4. Roland E. Kidwell
5. Lynn Godkin
6. Martin Hoegl
7. Jeffery D. Houghton
8. Garry A. Gelade

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Martin Hoegl
2. Jeffery D. Houghton
3. Jeanne M. Brett
4. M. Janssens
5. Kimberly S. Jaussi
6. Trudy C. Diliello
7. Amy E. Randel
8. M. Basadur

In Social Psychology

1. Shelley D. Dionne
2. Amy E. Randel
3. Kimberly S. Jaussi
4. Lynn Godkin
5. Roland E. Kidwell
6. Gary M. Fleischman
7. David Mazursky
8. Michael Gibbert

Citations in the corpus

• I Am, I Think I Can, and I Do: The Role of Personal Identity, Self-Efficacy, and Cross-Application of Experiences in Creativity at Work (2007, background): “Now more than ever before, organizations depend on building or maintaining their competitive position through innovation (Thompson, 2003).”
• Disentangling the effects of organizational capabilities, innovation and firm size on SME sales growth (2013, unknown): “The social and organizational psychology literature supports the view that greater participation in decision making produces both higher quality and quantity of ideas (Diehl and Stroebe 1987; Thompson 2003).”
• Maximizing organizational leadership capacity for the future (2006, background): “Because creative teamwork may be essential for maintaining a competitive advantage, Thompson (2003)”
• Cultural Intelligence in Global Teams (2006, background): “Realistic ideas are more likely to be implemented (Thompson, 2003).”
• Financial constraints in innovation projects: When is less more? (2008, background): “By the same token, however, it is very critical for financially constrained innovation teams to collaborate while allowing space and opportunity for individual creativity (Paulus, 2000; Thompson, 2003).”
• Innovation Management Measurement: A Review (2006, unknown): “…number of ideas generated in a period (cf. Chiesa et al. 1996; Lee et al. 1996), while others probe the extent to which organizations are using different generative tools and techniques (cf. Cebon and Newton 1999; Chiesa et al. 1996; Loch et al. 1996; Rochford 1991; Szakonyi 1994; Thompson 2003).”
• Creative Problem-Solving Process Styles, Cognitive Work Demands, and Organizational Adaptability (2014, background): “(e.g., Basadur, Runco, & Vega, 2000; Kim, 2011; Parnes, Noller, & Biondi, 1977; Puccio & Cabra, 2012; Puccio, Firestien, Coyle, & Masucci, 2006; Thompson, 2003).”
• Corporate Ethical Values, Group Creativity, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: The Impact of Work Context on Work Response (2011, background): “When employees perceive that both ethical and creative paradigms are consistent with their preferences, they should respond more favorably to a work environment that is believed to be rewarding and enriching (Hunt et al., 1989; Schwepker, 2001; Thompson, 2003), further enhancing different work respo”