Distinguishing between transformational and servant leadership

By Jeanine L. Parolini, K. Patterson, Bruce E. Winston. 2009

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b5b4f1c1fcb0ebc0d803f2b48d2de7c4cf789b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure (2010, background): “Barbuto and Wheeler (2006) introduced a 23-item five-dimensional instrument that would match the 10 characteristics described by Spears.”
The impact of servant leadership and subordinates' organizational tenure on trust in leader and attitudes (2014, background): “The construct of development on servant leadership has widely been examined (Akuchie, 1993; Choi and Mai-Dalton, 1998; Parolini et al., 2009; Sendjaya and Sarros, 2002).”
Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization (2013, background): “…there is mounting evidence that servant leadership is distinct from transformational leadership and leader–member exchange (LMX; Barbuto & Wheeler, 2006; Ehrhart, 2004; Liden et al., 2008; Parolini et al., 2009) and has incremental predictive validity (Liden et al., 2008; Schneider & George, 2011).”
A Systematic Literature Review of Servant Leadership Theory in Organizational Contexts (2012, background): “A burgeoning new research area and leadership theory that has been linked to ethics, virtues, and morality is servant leadership (Graham 1991; Lanctot and Irving 2010; Parolini et al. 2009; Russell 2001; Whetstone 2002).”
How Servant Leadership Influences Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of LMX, Empowerment, and Proactive Personality (2017, background): “…given its focus on follower development and empowerment, there is growing evidence that it is conceptually distinct and has incremental predictive validity (Ehrhart 2004; Liden et al. 2008; Parolini et al. 2009; Peterson et al. 2012; Reed 2015; Schaubroeck et al. 2011; Schneider and George 2011).”