Dispersion-Composition Models in Multilevel Research

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Entrepreneurial passion diversity in new venture teams: An empirical examination of short- and long-term performance implications (2020, background): “Because team-level phenomena comprise both mean-levels and dispersion-levels, one can only truly understand the impact of team-level concepts if both dimensions are considered (Cole et al., 2011; De Jong and Dirks, 2012).”
Justifying Aggregation With Consensus-Based Constructs (2015, background): “For example, low levels of within-unit homogeneity for certain units may suggest that under certain circumstances, the higher-level variable may be better represented by a dispersion model (Chan, 1998; Cole et al., 2011).”
It Isn’t Always Mutual (2015, background): “While these attributes are conceptually distinct, they are apt to be statistically related (Cole et al., 2011).”
The Leader–Member Exchange Relationship (2016, methodology): “…classical social exchange view of LMX. Building on recent advancements in LMX measurement (Bernerth et al., 2007), multilevel configural constructs (Cole et al., 2011), and statistical advances in modeling dyads (Gooty & Yammarino, 2011), our findings indicate that when levels of theory,…”