K. Schmidt

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · with Diestel · 2007–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 36 researchers and is trusted by 11 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom K. Schmidt trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Mark Muraven
  2. H. Weiss
  3. Philip M. Podsakoff
  4. Roy F. Baumeister
  5. B. Schmeichel
  6. P. Shrout
  7. Helfried Moosbrugger
  8. K. Schermelleh-Engel
  9. Walter Mischel
  10. Gordon W. Cheung

Who trusts K. Schmidt overall

  1. M. Jamal
  2. S. Diestel
  3. Émilie Lapointe
  4. John W. Molson
  5. Zachary A. Mercurio
  6. John P. Meyer
  7. Christian Vandenberghe
  8. Javier F. Boyas
  9. Radostina K. Purvanova
  10. M. Weideman

Papers from K. Schmidt's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers K. Schmidt trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. (Psychological methods)
  2. Intellectual performance and ego depletion: role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  3. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)
  5. Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of "people work"
  6. Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods (Multivariate Behavioral Research)
  7. Academic Examination Stress Impairs Self–Control
  8. Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method
  9. Job burnout. (Annual Review of Psychology)
  10. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. (Cognitive Psychology)

Their papers