Growth Modeling Using Random Coefficient Models: Model Building, Testing, and Illustrations

By P. Bliese, Robert E. Ployhart. 2002

782 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1de72f7498fbdd56f6a0ce9eceab7e671b66b72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Team deep-level diversity, relationship conflict, and team members' affective reactions: A cross-level investigation (2014, methodology): “The study focuses on two affective reactions of individual team members–satisfaction and desire to remain with the team–and uses multilevel analyses (Bliese & Ployhart, 2002; Hofmann, 1997) to test cross-level hypotheses.”
Bridging Methodological Divides Between Macro- and Microresearch: Endogeneity and Methods for Panel Data (2020, background): “Second, a common step recommended in estimating random-effects models is to determine whether the variance term associated with the slopes (τ11) is significant prior to adding a cross-level predictor (Bliese & Ployhart, 2002; Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002; Snijders & Bosker, 1999).”
Unpacking the Institutional Complexity in Adoption of CSR Practices in Multinational Enterprises (2016, methodology): “…employing methods like random coefficient growth modelling (RCM), future research could examine systematic patterns of change in a firm’s approach to the CSR adoption over time (Bliese and Ployhart, 2002) – whether such change is linear or non-linear, and whether such dynamics differ among MNEs.”
The Consequences of Human Resource Stocks and Flows: A Longitudinal Examination of Unit Service Orientation and Unit Effectiveness (2009, background): “For example, Bowen and Ostroff (2004) argued that HR practices are means of communicating an organization's goals in order to change individual cognitions and behavior.”
The “Quick Start Guide” for Conducting and Publishing Longitudinal Research (2011, background): “Lacking clear theory, the best way to build parsimonious longitudinal models is to use a model comparison approach ( Bliese and Ployhart 2002 ).”
Is This How I Will Be Treated? Reducing Uncertainty through Recruitment Interactions (2013, methodology): “Next, we applied a model-building approach (Bliese & Ployhart, 2002; Ployhart & Ward, 2011) that progressively estimates and evaluates more complex models.”
Understanding Relative and Absolute Change in Discontinuous Growth Models (2016, methodology): “Basic growth models are routinely tested using a sequence of stages (e.g., Bliese & Ployhart, 2002).”
Newcomers Abroad: Expatriate Adaptation during Early Phases of International Assignments (2014, methodology): “We followed guidelines provided by Bliese and Ployhart (2002) to test changes in work adjustment.”
Share, like, twitter, and connect: Ecological momentary assessment to examine the relationship between non-work social media use at work and work engagement (2018, methodology): “We followed Bliese and Ployhart (2002) to estimate multilevel models in R, using the NLME library written by Pinheiro and Bates (2000), and restricted maximum likelihood for estimation.”
The institutional context of poverty: State fragility as a predictor of cross‐national variation in commercial microfinance lending (2014, methodology): “Researchers usually report this cross-sectional model in RCM because it represents an initial baseline by which to compare subsequent growth patterns (Bliese and Ployhart, 2002).”
The Resilient Family Firm: Stakeholder Outcomes and Institutional Effects (2015, background): “It is important to include this in the model as our firms share characteristics of the higher level group (the country) and are therefore not fully independent from each other (Bliese & Ployhart, 2002).”
Time in Individual-Level Organizational Studies: What is it, How is it Used, and Why Isn't it Exploited More Often? (2015, background): “2Several excellent works on methodological issues related to time have been published, and we refer readers to these papers for additional information (e.g., Bliese & Ployhart 2002; Chan 1998, 2014; Pitariu & Ployhart 2010; Ployhart & Vandenberg 2010; Ployhart & Ward 2011; Singer & Willett 2003).”
When Customer Love Turns into Lasting Hate: The Effects of Relationship Strength and Time on Customer Revenge and Avoidance (2009, methodology): “To test H1–H2, we opted for an individual growth modeling approach (Bliese and Ployhart 2002) that simultaneously estimates both (1) the differences in aggregated levels over time and (2) the individual patterns of change over time (McCullough, Bono, and Root 2007; McCullough, Fincham, and Tsang…”
“I Put in Effort, Therefore I Am Passionate”: Investigating the Path from Effort to Passion in Entrepreneurship (2014, background): “For example, future research could use growth curve modeling to identify different patterns in the growth or decay of entrepreneurial effort and passion across individuals (Bliese & Ployhart, 2002).”
Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change (2010, methodology): “It can handle violations of the GLM error assumptions (Bliese & Ployhart, 2002; Littell, Milliken, Stroup, & Wolfinger, 1996) and situations in which each observation is measured on different occasions (Singer & Willett, 2003).”
A low-dose mindfulness intervention and recovery from work: effects on psychological detachment, sleep quality, and sleep duration (2015, methodology): “Specifically,we modelled a linear relationship first and then progressed to model quadratic and cubic relationships (Bliese & Ployhart, 2002).”