Unpacking the Institutional Complexity in Adoption of CSR Practices in Multinational Enterprises
By Valentina Marano, T. Kostova. 2016
389 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/923c3cbeb8ed4734e30fa94e08ae716fd9ccf5c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Valentina Marano
- David L. Levy
- Andreas Georg Scherer
- Arno Kourula
- N. Pisani
- T. Kostova
- Laura J. Spence
- C. Wickert
Citations in the corpus
- Walking and Talking Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications of Firm Size and Organizational Cost (2016, positive): “Since CSR activities in particular of large firms become increasingly standardized (Haack et al., 2012; Marano and Kostova, 2015), this may lead to a further erosion of competitive advantages generated from CSR engagement, for instance as a means of differentiation from competitors.”
- Social Movements as Catalysts for Corporate Social Innovation: Environmental Activism and the Adoption of Green Information Systems (2019, positive): “…practice adoption as an either/or outcome, more recent work has illuminated how decisions to adopt and implement a new practice are influenced by a complex set of strategic, political, and cultural factors at the organizational level (Carberry, 2012; Greenwood et al., 2011; Marano & Kostova, 2016).”
- How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review (2017, background): “This is likely the result of the challenges faced by researchers to gather the data that is necessary to compare the CSR practices of MNEs based in distinct countries, especially when the research aims to address the relationship between cross-country institutional complexity and CSR (for instance, ”
- Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises (2017, background): “Second, over time EM-MNEs become more embedded in global meta-fields where CSR reporting is a “mainstream business practice” and an enduring institutional feature (KPMG, 2013: 10; Marano & Kostova, 2015).”
- Corporate social responsibility: Evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives (2016, background): “…presented, we can conclude that both the institutional theory and stakeholders approach represent two solid pillars to explain and analyze the incorporation of corporate social responsibility actions by firms (Fernando & Lawrence, 2014; Marano & Kostova, 2015; Verbeke & Tung, 2013) as Fig.”