Leading cultural research in the future: A matter of paradigms and taste
By P. Christopher Earley. 2006
237 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anthropology, Communication, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d758b168aeed951db31bf78973c15550d972c5e0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Anthropology
- Karsten Jonsen
- P. Koveos
- Andreas Voigt
- A. van Hoorn
- Martha L. Maznevski
- G. Hofstede
- Martin C. Euwema
- Günter K. Stahl
In Communication
In Social Psychology
- Todd Weber
- William A. Gentry
- G. Sadri
- P. Koveos
- Linghui Tang
- A. van Hoorn
- Robbert Maseland
- N. Richter
Citations in the corpus
- The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance (2010, background): “Earley (2006) is less of a survey researcher, and he suggested that people should stop doing large-scale multi-country surveys altogether and go for alternative mid-range theories instead.”
- Cultural intelligence: A theory-based, short form measure (2015, background): “However, this latter set of studies has been criticized for an overreliance on values (Earley, 2006; Kirkman, Lowe, & Gibson, 2006) and alternatives”
- Cross-cultural Differences in Compensation Level and Inequality across Occupations: A Set-theoretic Analysis (2011, methodology): “Points of debate included data collection methods and sites, the data’s age, the specific number of cultural dimensions, and the concept of national culture as homogenous construct (Earley 2006; Hofstede 2002; Kirkman et al. 2006; McSweeney 2002, 2009; Smith 2002; Triandis 1995, 2004).”
- Explaining the negative correlation between values and practices: A note on the Hofstede–GLOBE debate (2009, background): “…Geert Hofstede and the researchers involved in the GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness) project concerning the right approach to measuring culture (Earley, 2006; Hofstede, 2006; Javidan, House, Dorfman, Hanges, & Sully de Luque, 2006; Leung, 2006; Smith, 2006).”
- Comparative International Entrepreneurship (2016, unknown): “Berry, guillén, & Zhou, 2010; Earley, 2006; grenness, 2012; Lenartowicz & Roth, 2004; L. Lim & firkola, 2000; Malhotra, Agarwal, & Peterson, 1996).”
- Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups (2010, background): “…consists of a commonly held body of beliefs and values that define the ‘‘shoulds’’ and the ‘‘oughts’’ of life (Hofstede, 1980; House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, & Gupta, 2004; Lane et al., 2009), and guide the meaning that people attach to aspects of the world around themselves (Earley, 2006).”
- Measuring Hofstede's Five Dimensions of Cultural Values at the Individual Level: Development and Validation of CVSCALE (2011, unknown): “However, a more urgent, meaningful research agenda is to use CVSCALE in testing prominent theories of culture at the individual level and explaining cross-cultural phenomena by culture ( Earley 2006 ).”
- Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: a three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions. (2010, unknown): “Researchers are now questioning this assumption (Earley, 2006).”
- The Impact of Institutional and Human Resource Distance on International Entry Strategies (2009, background): “In consequence, there is considerable debate about whether and how best to measure cultural differences (Earley, 2006; Shenkar et al., 2008).”
- Examining career-related mentoring and managerial performance across cultures: A multilevel analysis☆ (2008, methodology): “As with all major cross-cultural frameworks, this method of examining culture has generated some skepticism and debate (Earley, 2006; Hofstede, 2006; Javidan, House, Dorfman, Hanges, & Sully de Luque, 2006; Smith, 2006).”
- Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures (2007, background): “A limitation of the GLOBE study however is that both leadership and organizational practices are primarily assessed with self reported surveys among managers, asking managers what is effective in their society (Earley, 2006; Peterson, 2004; Smith, 2006).”
- A framework to update Hofstede's cultural value indices: economic dynamics and institutional stability (2008, background): “However, it may also indicate that the GLOBE definition of values (i.e., what should be the values in an organization or society) is different from how values have typically been measured in crosscultural research (Earley, 2006; Smith, 2006).”
- Cultural intelligence, global mindset, and cross-cultural competencies: a systematic review using bibliometric methods (2020, background): “A commentary outlining CQ as an alternative concept for future cross-cultural research (Earley, 2006)”