The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance

By G. Hofstede. 2010

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Communication, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a4e62809f4925954d46c1889936ceaccdeeca0e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. Jeannie L. Johnson
2. Frank L. Schmidt
3. John B. Cullen
4. K. Parboteeah
5. Tomasz Lenartowicz
6. Narasimhan Srinivasan
7. In-Sue Oh

In Communication

1. Jeannie L. Johnson
2. Olivier Furrer
3. Marina Dabic
4. Frank L. Schmidt
5. John B. Cullen
6. K. Parboteeah
7. Tomasz Lenartowicz
8. D. Brock

In Social Psychology

1. P. Fu
2. Jeannie L. Johnson
3. Olivier Furrer
4. Marina Dabic
5. Mahfooz A. Ansari
6. E. Reynaud
7. A. Pekerti
8. Frank L. Schmidt

Citations in the corpus

• The Concept of Distance in International Business Research: A Review and Research Agenda (2016, neutral): “However, persuasive critique by Shenkar (2001) and the lack of consensus concerning the use of intrinsic characteristics to proxy specific cultural distance dimensions (Hofstede 2006, 2010; Tung and Verbeke 2010) undermine the exclusive focus on cultural distance.”
• National Rates of Opportunity Entrepreneurship Activity: Insights from Institutional Anomie Theory (2014, result): “Given the recent debates regarding the Hofstede and GLOBE culture measures (Hofstede, 2010; Taras et al., 2010), it is important to know that our findings for individualism were robust as they replicated findings for the Hofstede measure of individualism.”
• Methods for Second Order Meta-Analysis and Illustrative Applications (2013, background): “because cultural values, industrialization levels, and management practices of these countries are different to some extent (Hofstede, 2010).”
• A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce (2011, background): “…business literature, there have been conceptual and methodological critiques of the cultural values frameworks developed by Hofstede (e.g., McSweeney 2002; Oyserman et al. 2002) and the GLOBE project (e.g., Hofstede 2010; Peterson and Castro 2006; Taras et al. 2010; Tung and Verbeke 2010).”
• When the dark ones gain power: Perceived position power strengthens the effect of supervisor Machiavellianism on abusive supervision in work teams (2016, neutral): “A potential limitation is that our study was conducted in the Netherlands: a country with a rather low power distance (the acceptance of and the expectation that power is distributed unequally; Hofstede, 2010).”