The Impact of Institutional and Human Resource Distance on International Entry Strategies

By Saul Estrin, Delia Baghdasaryan, K. Meyer. 2009

286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70e9c2cb4de7fdee13a91e32d740e9a8c1652513

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. K. Meyer
2. Saul Estrin
3. Yuan Ding
4. Hua Zhang
5. Jing Li
6. Bo Bernhard Nielsen
7. S. Nielsen
8. Mike W. Peng

In Strategy and Management

1. K. Meyer
2. Bo Bernhard Nielsen
3. Saul Estrin
4. Yuan Ding
5. S. Nielsen
6. Hua Zhang
7. Jing Li
8. Mike W. Peng

Citations in the corpus

• The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. (2009, unknown): “The potential institutional variables include institution relatedness (Peng et al., 2005), institutional distance (Chan, Isobe, & Makino, 2008; Estrin, Baghdasaryan, & Meyer, 2009; Xu & Shenkar, 2002), legal origins (La Porta et al., 2008), and corruption indexes (Cu-ervo-Cazurra & Genc, 2008; Lee…”
• The Concept of Distance in International Business Research: A Review and Research Agenda (2016, unknown): “Finally, there are some unconventional, other distances: Kourula (2010), introduced ‘civil society distance’, Chen (2003) ‘network distance’, Estrin et al. (2009) ‘human resource distance’ and West and Graham (2004) ‘linguistic distance’.”
• Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: A cross-country analysis (2016, background): “…importance of both home and host country institutions for international strategies, most empirical work has focused on host country characteristics (e.g., Delios & Henisz, 2003; Meyer et al., 2014) or the distance between home and host countries (e.g., Estrin et al., 2009a, Tihanyi et al., 2005).”
• Sub‐National Institutional Contingencies, Network Positions, and IJV Partner Selection (2012, unknown): “The country of origin of FDI affects the institutional distance between both the host and home countries (Estrin et al., 2009).”
• The Impact of Added Cultural Distance and Cultural Diversity on International Expansion Patterns: A Penrosean Perspective (2011, unknown): “A fifth distance dimension, namely human resource distance (Estrin et al., 2009), has recently been identified.”
• Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness (2011, unknown): “…entrants may choose acquisition or joint venture entry; when they need resources that can be acquired on markets, such as office space, real estate or employees, land, or natural resources they may choose greenfield entry (Brouthers and Hennart, 2007; Estrin et al., 2009; Meyer et al., 2009b).”
• Overcoming distrust: How state-owned enterprises adapt their foreign entries to institutional pressures abroad (2014, methodology): “Specifically, we controlled for ‘distance’ between home and host countries, a key concern in earlier entry mode research (Slangen & Hennart, 2007, Estrin et al., 2009, Tihanyi et al., 2005, Zhao et al., 2004), using two measures from Dow’s distance indices (Dow & Karunaratna, 2006), namely…”
• The Moderating Impact of Informal Institutional Distance and Formal Institutional Risk on SME Entry Mode Choice (2011, unknown): “indices to display informal institutional distance has been conducted by other management scholars such as Estrin et al. (2009). The Hermes Country Risk Rating was used to measure the second moderator variable formal institutional risk prevalent in the host country.”