Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise

By Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, D. Sandy Staples. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2001

550 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c498196dd855a44fc1f9dc19cad08a90f8cc15fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Computer Science Applications

In Information Systems and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Influence of Project Commitment and Team Commitment on the Relationship between Trust and Knowledge Sharing in Project Teams (2017, background): “Indeed, studies have found affective organizational commitment to be positively associated with knowledge sharing (Hislop, 2003; Jarvenpaa & Staples, 2001; Lin, 2007; Van den Hooff & De Leeuw van Weenen, 2004).”
To share or not to share: modeling knowledge sharing using exchange ideology as a moderator (2007, unknown): “Social exchanges (Witt et al., 2001) have been also mentioned to be useful in influencing knowledge sharing (Jarvenpaa and Staples, 2001).”
Knowledge sharing among Malaysian academics: Influence of affective commitment and trust (2013, unknown): “Similarly, Jarvenpaa and Staples (2001) argued that a higher level of commitment might “engender beliefs that the organization has rights to the information and knowledge one has created or acquired” (p.156).”
Determinants Of Knowledge Sharing Behaviors: Developing And Testing An Integrated Theoretical Model (2006, methodology): “…of pro-social norms, focus on learning, tolerance for mistakes, high trustworthiness, identification with the interests of the organization and so forth (Hinds and Pfeffer 2003; Dixon 2000; Jarvenpaa and Staples 2000; Leonard and Sensiper 1998; Constant et al. 1994, 1996; Wasko and Faraj 2000).”
How Low Should You Go? Low Response Rates and the Validity of Inference in IS Questionnaire Research (2006, background): “Other researchers allowed respondents to participate in a drawing (Jarvenpaa and Staples, 2001; Bhattacherjee, 2001).”
Usability and Sociability in Online Communities: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Seeking and Contribution (2009, background): “…on knowledge sharing have typically focused either on knowledge contribution (e.g., Bock et al. 2005; Kankanhalli et al., 2005a; Wasko and Faraj, 2005), or on knowledge seeking (e.g., Kankanhalli et al., 2005b; Zhang and Watts, 2003), or pooled them together (e.g., Jarvenpaa and Staples, 2001).”
Privacy Concerns Versus Desire for Interpersonal Awareness in Driving the Use of Self-Disclosure Technologies: The Case of Instant Messaging in Two Cultures (2011, methodology): “Examples include information reciprocation between employees and their organizations [51], information sharing in professional networks [121], contributing to knowledge repositories [53], the effects of implementation-team responsiveness on user evaluations and approval of a system [35], knowledge s”
Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Management Systems (2014, background): “…acknowledge that accumulation of team and organizational knowledge depends on knowledge sharing between employees (Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000; Jarvenpaa & Staples, 2001; Nonaka, 1994; Polanyi, 1966; Tsoukas & Vladimirou, 2001), and “the lack of attention to micro-foundations has the…”
Organizational Factors to Support Knowledge Management and Innovation (2011, background): “…promotion of trust, confidence and openness (Gold et al., 2001; Lee and Choi, 2003), a sense of a common intention for all organizational members (Jarvenpaa and Staples, 2003), empowerment through an emphasis on responsible behavior (Lee and Cole, 2003) or the development of a common…”
Knowledge sharing and the psychological contract: Managing knowledge workers across different stages of employment (2007, unknown): “Perceptions of individual and organizational ownership of knowledge have been found to increase the propensity for sharing (Jarvenpaa and Staples, 2001).”