Knowledge sharing and the psychological contract: Managing knowledge workers across different stages of employment

By Bonnie S. O’Neill, Monica P. Adya. 2007

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0dae97c72a70d7792df2ad15cebac62b0b2f12c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use (2010, background): “Affect-based and cognition-based trust together accounted for approximately 25 percent of the variance in willingness to share tacit knowledge As O’Neill and Adya (2007) have pointed out, professionals may tend to view themselves as relatively autonomous, with as much or more commitment to their…”
The Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Innovation upon Sustainable Performance in Islamic Banks: A Mediation Analysis through an SEM Approach (2019, background): “In knowledge management, knowledge sharing seems to be the critical factor [35,36].”
Understanding the changing nature of psychological contracts in 21st century organizations (2017, background): “In sum, the findings indicate that PCs change over the course of the socialization process (O’Neill & Adya, 2007), and these changes depend on relations with the distal and proximal representatives of the organization.”
The relative impact of attribute, severity, and timing of psychological contract breach on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes (2013, background): “Research has demonstrated the diverse and evolving nature of psychological contracts of new hires, temporary workers, and long-standing employees (Millward and Hopkins, 1998; O’Neill and Adya, 2007; Rousseau, 1990).”
A model of knowledge‐sharing motivation (2009, background): “…of sharing norms by articulating them, acting as a role model by sharing their own knowledge, and helping subordinates synthesize incoming information and articulate a common goal that will facilitate knowledge creation (Nonaka, von Krogh, & Voelpel, 2006; O’Neill & Adya, 2007; Rosen et al., 2007).”