The Moderating Effect of Individuals' Perceptions of Ethical Work Climate on Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions

By Tim Barnett, Cheryl Vaicys. 2000

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3df71e8873e51fbb6a0eeb10d6e60bbb2dc8bf3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. C. Bateman
2. Gary R. Rothwell
3. S. Murphy
4. Weichun Zhu
5. Shane Connelly
6. Ryan P. Brown
7. Jason H. Hill
8. J. Baldwin

In Information Systems and Management

1. C. Bateman
2. Alexander Newman
3. Weichun Zhu
4. Lütfihak Alpkan
5. Tuna Cenkci
6. Gary R. Rothwell
7. S. Murphy
8. Shane Connelly

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Alexander Newman
2. R. Riggio
3. Weichun Zhu
4. A. Legood
5. John J. Sosik
6. Bruce J. Avolio
7. Allan Lee
8. G. Schwarz

Citations in the corpus

• The Heterogeneous Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities That Target Different Stakeholders (2013, unknown): “As pointed out in Barnett and Vaicys (2000), the ethical climate influences stakeholders’ imputation of ethical values and ethical judgments.”
• The Impact of Ethical Ideologies, Moral Intensity, and Social Context on Sales-Based Ethical Reasoning (2011, background): “…research examines how variables operating at one or two levels of influence independently affect ethical decision making (e.g., Baker et al., 2006; Barnett and Vaicys, 2000; Bass et al., 1998; McCabe et al., 1996; Treviño and Youngblood 1990; Valentine and Barnett, 2007), but few studies…”
• Environmental Influences on Ethical Decision Making: Climate and Environmental Predictors of Research Integrity (2007, methodology): “…of these 338 MUMFORD ET AL. decisions represents a limitation on generality, application of the method has become widespread in studies of ethics (Barnett & Vaicys, 2000; Eastman, Eastman, & Tolson, 2001; Forte, 2004; Mayo & Marks, 1990; Paolillo & Vitell, 2002) in part because of risk…”
• Cheating more when the spoils are split (2011, background): “…situational factors have shown that unethical behavior is more likely to occur in egoistic ethical climates than in benevolent ethical climates (Barnett & Vaicys, 2000), and less likely to occur in organizations that have a code of conduct than it is in those without such codes of conduct…”
• Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior (2019, background): “themselves do not believe such practices to be unethical (Barnett and Vaicys 2000).”