Public Service Motivation and Job Performance

By Pablo de Andrés Alonso, Gregory B. Lewis. 2001

379 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Public Administration, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbeff3bab65b344455fa88a488c3c2f41b7e6cce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Sangmook Kim
2. N. V. van Loon
3. Jeannette Taylor
4. P. Leisink
5. W. Vandenabeele
6. Bangcheng Liu
7. Alexander Newman
8. G. Schwarz

In Public Administration

1. Bangcheng Liu
2. J. Caillier
3. Sangmook Kim
4. W. Vandenabeele
5. P. Leisink
6. N. V. van Loon
7. N. Eva
8. Alexander Newman

In Strategy and Management

1. Wisanupong Potipiroon
2. M. Ford
3. J. Caillier
4. N. Eva
5. Qing Miao
6. G. Schwarz
7. Alexander Newman
8. W. Vandenabeele

Citations in the corpus

• Clarifying the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and In-Role and Extra-Role Behaviors: The Relative Contributions of Person-Job and Person-Organization Fit (2017, background): “However, there have also been studies that have either failed or only partly established a relationship between PSM and performance (Alonso & Lewis, 2001; Petrovsky & Ritz, 2014; Ritz, 2009).”
• Organizational Influences, Public Service Motivation and Work Outcomes: An Australian Study (2008, methodology): “This research supports the literature that PSM is positively linked to favorable work outcomes (Alonso and Lewis 2001; Brewer and Selden 1998; Perry and Wise 1990), particularly when there is a fit between the PSM levels of the respondents and their job, as shown by the strong relation between…”
• Does Public Service Motivation Always Lead to Organizational Commitment? Examining the Moderating Roles of Intrinsic Motivation and Ethical Leadership (2017, methodology): “This measure has been used in several PSM studies (e.g., Alonso & Lewis, 2001; Bellé, 2013; Brewer & Selden, 2000; Christensen & Wright, 2011; Kim, 2006; Pandey et al., 2008; Stazyk & Davis, 2015; Wright, 2008).”
• Employee Empowerment and Job Satisfaction in the U.S. Federal Bureaucracy (2015, background): “Even among public employees with higher levels of public service motivation, monetary rewards appear to be significantly valued (Alonso & Lewis, 2001; Perry, Mesch, & Paarlberg, 2006; Wittmer, 1991).”
• Does Public Service Motivation Mediate the Relationship between Goal Clarity and both Organizational Commitment and Extra-Role Behaviours? (2016, methodology): “While these items are an abbreviated version of Perry’s (1996) original scale, they are often used by scholars to measure PSM (Alonso and Lewis 2001; Brewer and Selden 2000; Christensen et al. 2013; Kim 2005; Pandey, Wright, and Moynihan 2008; Wright, Moynihan, and Pandey 2012; Wright and Pandey…”
• Public service motivation and performance: The role of organizational identification (2018, background): “In response to the inconsistent results of previous PSM-performance studies (for example Alonso & Lewis, 2001), there have been repeated calls to investigate this relationship.”
• Antecedents affecting public service motivation (2007, neutral): “performance (Brewer and Seldon, 2000; Naff and Crum, 1999; Lewis and Alonso, 2001); and”
• Relationship between Motivational Factors and Job Performance of Employees in Malaysian Service Industry (2013, background): “According to Blanchard and Witts (2009), employees greatly desire to have the tools, training, support and authority to make decisions and perform their jobs correctly.”
• Work-Related Stressors and Health-Related Outcomes in Public Service (2015, neutral): “…to positive consequences such as job satisfaction, intentions to retain, organizational commitment, citizenship behavior, and job performance (Alonso & Lewis, 2001; Bright, 2007, 2008; Christensen & Wright, 2011; Hsieh, Yang, & Fu, 2012; Naff & Crum, 1999; Perry, Hondeghem, & Wise, 2010;…”
• Sense of community, sense of community responsibility, organizational commitment and identification, and public service motivation: a simultaneous test of affective states on employee well-being and engagement in a public service work context (2020, methodology): “One person might suggest that highly engaged and psychologically-well employees possess a high level of public service motivation (Alonso and Lewis 2001; Andersen and Kjeldsen 2013; Bright 2008; Homberg, McCarthy, and Tabvuma 2015; Naff and Crum 1999; Perry and Hondeghem 2008; Perry and Wise 1990;…”