Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation

By A. Somech, A. Drach‐Zahavy. 2013

554 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a78d6e935344c0f001087aac5d896f7314a896f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Matej Cerne
2. Miha Škerlavaj
3. Anders Dysvik
4. Yannick Bammens
5. J. Liedtka
6. Le Zhou
7. Houn-Gee Chen
8. Yu-Qian Zhu

In Mechanical Engineering

1. J. Liedtka
2. Francesco Montani
3. Yaping Gong
4. Kala S. Retna
5. Jeffery S. McMullen
6. Alexander S. Kier

In Social Psychology

1. Francesco Montani
2. Anders Dysvik
3. Mo Wang
4. Matej Cerne
5. Miha Škerlavaj
6. Yannick Bammens
7. J. Liedtka
8. Le Zhou

Citations in the corpus

• Service innovation implementation: a systematic review and research agenda (2020, background): “…Jarvis, Bitner, & Ostrom, 2010; Goodman & Pennings, 1977), continuance in the use of innovation (Maroulis & Wilensky, 2015; Rogers, 1983; Somech & Drach-Zahavy, 2013), added value (Lambooij & Koster, 2016), and the extent to which innovation is routinized (Johnson, 2001; Lapiedra,…”
• Effects of sales force market orientation on creativity, innovation implementation, and sales performance (2015, background): “First, it is well established that innovation is a two-stage process that involves creativity (idea generation) and implementation (George, 2007; Somech & Drach-Zahavy, 2013), yet no studies have incorporated both stages in relation to MO, as some investigated creativity while the majority focused…”
• A Conservation of Resources Perspective on Negative Affect and Innovative Work Behaviour: the Role of Affect Activation and Mindfulness (2016, unknown): “…ideas but also on developing these ideas beyond their initial states via promotion and implementation-related activities (Choi and Chang 2009; Somech and Drach-Zahavy 2013), it is important to examine the extent to which negative affect represents a barrier or a driver to the overall…”
• When and how does functional diversity influence team innovation? The mediating role of knowledge sharing and the moderation role of affect-based trust in a team (2016, background): “A team with functionally diverse members can potentially benefit from its diverse pool of knowledge, skills and information by sharing and combining them to generate novel ideas (Somech and Drach-Zahavy, 2013).”
• Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction (2015, background): “The team learning literature makes a similar point (Boland and Tenkasi, 1995; Somech and Drach-Zahavy, 2013).”
• Implications of Family Business Employment for Employees’ Innovative Work Involvement (2015, background): “Direct encouragements from the work climate refer to top-down signals and pointers that inform and reassure employees that their innovative work involvement will be allowed for, welcomed, and paid attention to (Somech & Drach-Zahavy, 2013; Zhou & George, 2001).”
• Relationships Between Work Team Climate, Individual Motivation, and Creativity (2018, background): “Following Anderson et al. (2014), Montag et al. (2012), and Somech and Drach-Zahavy (2013), we define creativity as individual behaviors that give rise to ideas that are novel and useful.”
• Innovating under stress: The role of commitment and leader-member exchange (2017, background): “Effective innovation depends on having novel and useful ideas and on developing these ideas beyond their initial states via promotion and implementation-related activities (Anderson et al., 2014; Choi & Chang, 2009; Somech & Drach-Zahavy, 2013).”