Predicting workplace victim status from personality

By Iain Coyne, E. Seigne, P. Randall. 2000

353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f9e42beaa010ebe6b743eab4a2b00ee5ac24617

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Target personality and workplace victimization: A prospective analysis (2010, background): “Such behaviours could take one of at least two forms: negative interpersonal behaviour that makes people dislike the person, or behaviours indicating the person is vulnerable and an easy target for victimization (suggested also by Aquino & Bradfield, 2000; Coyne et al., 2000; Harvey, et al., 2006; M”
Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative study (2007, background): “Increasing attention has been devoted to the concept of workplace bullying during the preceding 10–15 years, and various factors, ranging from personality traits to organizational factors, have been studied as possible antecedents of bullying at work (eg, Coyne, Seigne, & Randall, 2000 ; Zapf, 199”
Ways of Explaining Workplace Bullying: A Review of Enabling, Motivating and Precipitating Structures and Processes in the Work Environment (2003, background): “Similarly, some victim characteristics such as dependence, instability, introversion and conscientiousness can further affect perceptions of power differences and lessen the risks of the target being able to retaliate efficiently (Coyne et al., 2000).”
Workplace bullying: a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes (2006, methodology): “Zapf (1999) and Coyne et al. (2000) studied organizational problems and employee personality as potential risk factors.”
Job insecurity, perceived employability and targets' and perpetrators' experiences of workplace bullying (2009, background): “This rationale aligns with findings from bullying research: Being a target of workplace bullying has been associated with indicators of weakness (Vartia, 1996 ), and targets tend to express difficulties in coping with stress situations (Coyne, Seigne, & Randall, 2000 ).”
Workplace Bullying, Mobbing and General Harassment: A Review (2013, neutral): “introverted, anxious, conscientious, neurotic, submissive (Coyne et al. 2000), less agreeable (Glasø et al.”
Burned by Bullying in the American Workplace: Prevalence, Perception, Degree and Impact† (2007, neutral): “Bullying results in a ripple effect indicating that the phenomenon does not involve just a few ‘problem’ employees (Coyne et al., 2000), but rather is a dynamic process that © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007 negatively impacts everyone in the workgroup.”