Target personality and workplace victimization: A prospective analysis

By N. Bowling, T. Beehr, M. Bennett, C. Watson. 2010

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd36a0760c524999561423c40e809d270188a2ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Exposure to workplace harassment and the Five Factor Model of personality: A meta-analysis (2017, background): “…between negative affectivity and workplace bullying as negative affectivity was associated with subsequent workplace victimization (r = 0.33; p b 0.01), whereas baseline victimization also was related to increased negative affectivity (r = 0.27; p b 0.01) at follow-up (Bowling et al., 2010).”
Is workplace bullying related to the personality traits of victims? A two-year prospective study (2015, background): “Although no previous longitudinal studies have compared the relative long-term effects of the FFM traits and work factors on bullying, Bowling et al. (2010) found that negative affectivity had stronger impact on subsequent victimization than job characteristics and role stressors.”
The impact of role stressors on workplace bullying in both victims and perpetrators, controlling for personal vulnerability factors: A longitudinal analysis (2012, background): “In regard to the latter mechanism, Bowling et al. (2010) found that negative affectivity has a significant effect on workplace victimization.”
What Have I Done to Deserve This? Effects of Employee Personality and Emotion on Abusive Supervision (2014, methodology): “In summary, victim precipitation theory and subsequent empirical work support the premise that personality traits predispose individuals to exhibit cognitive, emotional, or behavioral responses that may encourage victimization because these responses either suggest vulnerability or are provocative (”