Measurement Error in Research on Human Resources and Firm Performance: Additional Data and Suggestions for Future Research

By Patrick M. Wright, Timothy M. Gardner, L. Moynihan, H. Park, B. Gerhart, John E. Delery. 2001

291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Gerhart and colleagues (2000) and Huselid and Becker (2000) recently debated the presence and implications of measurement error in measures of human resource practices. This paper presents data from 3 more studies, 1 of large organizations from different industries at the corporate level, 1 from commercial banks, and the other of autonomous business units at the level of the job. Results of all 3 studies provide additional evidence that single respondent measures of HR practices contain large amounts of measurement error. Implications for future research into the HR firm performance relationship are discussed.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d947c02e01b72d67fbd5e7063415a1a0727b7de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. Jason D. Shaw
  2. D. Kooij
  3. Jyotsna Bhatnagar
  4. P. M. Bal
  5. Annet de Lange
  6. Paul G. W. Jansen
  7. Patrick M. Wright
  8. N. Gupta

In Strategy and Management

  1. Jason D. Shaw
  2. Jyotsna Bhatnagar
  3. Patrick M. Wright
  4. W. Boswell
  5. Anuradha Sharma
  6. D. Kooij
  7. L. Moynihan
  8. Paul G. W. Jansen

Citations in the corpus