Testing a Revised Measure of Public Service Motivation: Reflective versus Formative Specification

By Sangmook Kim. 2011

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/788d8e25b19286035a734845e35eb57900dbbbff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Public Administration

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Work-Related Stressors and Health-Related Outcomes in Public Service (2015, background): “The generalizability of its dimensional structure and items is still being tested (Kim, 2011).”
Does Public Service Motivation Mediate the Relationship between Goal Clarity and both Organizational Commitment and Extra-Role Behaviours? (2016, background): “Kim (2011) demonstrated that PSM had a positive effect on the commitment of Korean firefighters.”
Public sector motivation ad fonts : Personality traits as antecedents of the motivation to serve the public interest (2017, methodology): “Recently, an effort has been made to assess the different PSM measurement instruments to test the effects that each instrument has on the dimensionality, reliability and validity of the underlying PSM construct (Kim, 2009a, 2009b, 2011).”
Work motivation and public service motivation: disentangling varieties of motivation and job satisfaction (2018, background): “PSM is composite in nature and is the result of higher or lower ‘needs’ associated with the rational, normative, and affective motives (Kim 2010).”
The Psychological Mechanisms of Public Service Motivation (2016, methodology): “To develop full content-valid items for the Chinese version of the PSM Scale, we conducted an extensive review of the literature on PSM (Kim, 2009, 2011; Perry, 1996; Vandenabeele, 2008a).”
Street-level bureaucrats’ turnover intention: does public service motivation matter? (2017, methodology): “…(1996) scale have been widely used in previous studies (e.g. Alonso and Lewis, 2001; Brewer and Selden, 2000; Coursey et al., 2012; Kim, 2005; Pandey et al., 2008; Wright and Pandey, 2008), several recent studies have also used multidimensional models (e.g. Kim, 2011; Kim et al., forthcoming).”
The Dimensions of Public Service Motivation and Sector Work Preferences (2012, methodology): “…dimensions of PSM, we follow both Taylor (2007), in seeking to understand the relative importance of PSM’s dimensions to sector preference, and those researchers (Coursey et al., 2008; Kim, 2011; Kim & Vandenabeele, 2010) who argue that all of PSM’s dimensions should be included in PSM analyses.”
Common Method Bias in Public Management Studies (2015, background): “Some of the studies mention or discuss the risk of common method bias and some also seek to measure or correct for the potential bias through the survey design or statistical remedies (e.g., Hassan and Rohrbaugh 2011; Kim 2011).”
Does Public Service Motivation Always Lead to Organizational Commitment? Examining the Moderating Roles of Intrinsic Motivation and Ethical Leadership (2017, background): “This view has been echoed and supported by a plethora of PSM studies (Castaing, 2006; Kim, 2011; Moynihan & Pandey, 2007; Vandenabeele & Ban, 2009).”
Public Service Motivation and Professionalism (2012, background): “88), but the public service motivation literature has begun to treat the concept as first order reflective and second order formative ( Wright & Christensen, 2009 ; Kim, 2011 ).”