A confirmatory factor analysis of IS employee motivation and retention
By B. Mak, H. Sockel. Information Manager (The), 2001
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d8683044761263c0654466b205e0c3c46428054
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- G. Özer
- Ali E. Akgün
- Birgit Renzl
- C. A. Chen
- Chao-Min Chiu
- Kurt Matzler
- Pattarawan Prasarnphanich
- Chen-Chi Chang
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- The analysis of antecedents of customer loyalty in the Turkish mobile telecommunication market (2005, background): “Unidimensionality is a necessary condition for reliability and construct validation ( Mak and Sockel, 2001”
- National customer satisfaction indices: an implementation in the Turkish mobile telephone market (2005, methodology): “To assess discriminant validity, confirmatory factor analysis was performed on a selected pair of scales, allowing for correlation between two constructs, following the lead of Mak and Sockel (2001”
- Critical Barriers to Implementation of Reverse Logistics in the Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study of a Developing Country (2018, unknown): “90 to present strong convergent validity [138].”
- Relationship of Servant Leadership and Employee Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Employee Satisfaction (2012, unknown): “In research by Mak [14], Mohamed et al.”
- Do the Big Five Personality Factors Affect Knowledge Sharing Behaviour? A Study of Malaysian Universities (2011, background): “…values are within the threshold limits suggested in the SEM literature (e.g. Browne and Cudeck 1993; Vandenberg and Scarpello 1994; Forza and Filippini 1998; Mak and Sockel 2001; Hair et al. 2010) Figure 1 shows the path coefficients, their significance levels, and the R 2 values of the full model.”
- The Relationship between Interpersonal Trust, Employee Satisfaction, and Employee Loyalty (2006, background): “…to attract and keep highly qualified and highly performing employees (Matzler et al., minant of organizational commitment and loyalty (e.g. Mak & Sockel, 2001; Martensen & Gronholdt, 2001), it is negatively related to turnover (e.g. Tekleab et al., 2005; Ward, 1988) and absenteeism (e.g.…”
- Understanding the Antecedents of Effective Knowledge Management: The Importance of a Knowledge-Centered Culture (2003, background): “Because of the increased risk of skill obsolescence, IS workers have an increased exposure to job-related stress ( Mak & Sockel, 2001 ).”
- Team Stressors, Management Support, and Project and Process Outcomes in New Product Development Projects (2007, background): “Essentially, supportive management trust their people and have confidence in their ability to carry out their jobs (Mak and Sockel, 2001; Yoon et al., 2001).”
- Using training and development to affect job satisfaction within franchising (2007, background): “Job satisfaction is an important motivator for employee performance and has been found to inversely relate to turnover ( Mak and Sockel, 1999”
- The effect of TQM practices on employee satisfaction and loyalty in government (2010, background): “Employee satisfaction has traditionally been defined as an important motivator for employee performance (Mak & Sockel, 2001 ).”