Reconceptualizing intervention integrity: A partnership‐based framework for linking research with practice
By Thomas J. Power, Jessica Blom-Hoffman, A. Clarke, T. C. Riley-Tillman, Constance Kelleher, Patricia H. Manz. 2005
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16556d2f2da75a55ba091750e07f33c7930d28e1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- K. Herman
- W. Reinke
- M. Raab
- Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti
- C. Dunst
- Lori L. Newcomer
- C. Webster-Stratton
- Thomas Kratochwill
In General Health Professions
- Milena A. Keller‐Margulis
- C. Dunst
- W. Reinke
- K. Herman
- Thomas Kratochwill
- M. Raab
- C. Trivette
- Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti
Citations in the corpus
- Treatment Integrity of Interventions With Children in the School Psychology Literature from 1995 to 2008 (2011, background): “…RTI movements motivated scholars (e.g., Brown & Rahn-Blakeslee, 2009; Fixsen, Naoom, Blasé, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005; Jones, Clarke, & Power, 2008; Noell, 2008; Noell & Gansle, 2006; Power et al., 2005) to attend to the role of treatment integrity in contemporary education research and practice.”
- Handbook of school violence and school safety : international research and practice (2012, unknown): “4324 / 9780203841372 . c h4 said to have high treatment integrity (Gresham, 1989; Power et al., 2005).”
- Fidelity of implementation framework: A critical need for response to intervention models (2012, background): “The participatory model urges the involvement of key individuals in the identification of essential components to foster an interest and dedication to the process (Power et al., 2005) and can be a way to enhance acceptability and motivation for those who will be involved in implementation of the int”
- The Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management Training: The Methods and Principles That Support Fidelity of Training Delivery (2011, methodology): “…or the IY trainer’s skill level of using the training methods, processes, and learning principles employed in the original program model, and (3) treatment differentiation, or implementation of the program for the population for whom the program was designed (Gresham, 2009; Power et al., 2005).”
- Advances in Treatment Integrity Research: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Enhancement of Treatment Integrity (2009, unknown): “…of participants' response to treatment as dimensions of integrity (see Table 1), includ ing participant adherence to treatment and par ticipant enactment of skills targeted in the 462 intervention (e.g., Bellg et al., 2004; Hulleman & Cordray, 2009; Jones, Clark, & Power, 2008; Power et al., 2005).”
- Treatment Integrity in Behavioral Consultation: Measurement, Promotion, and Outcomes (2007, background): “Even when the authors of a manualized treatment have not provided a treatment integrity assessment, it is relatively easy to develop a treatment integrity assessment if program procedures are delineated clearly (Power et al., 2005).”
- An Implementation Science Framework for Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Fidelity in Early Childhood Intervention Studies (2013, background): “A number of different frameworks have been proposed for conceptualizing fidelity (e.g., Carroll et al., 2007; Century, Rudnick, & Freeman, 2010; Power et al., 2005; Rudnick, Freeman, & Century, 2012).”
- Toward Developing a Science of Treatment Integrity: Introduction to the Special Series (2009, unknown): “For example, a significant majority of the models (Dane & Schneider, 1998; Noell, 2008; Power et al., 446 2005; Jones et al., 2008; Waltz et al., 1?”
- Balancing Fidelity with Flexibility and Fit: What Do We Really Know about Fidelity of Implementation in Schools? (2013, background): “More recently, researchers have begun to advocate for capturing both structural and process dimensions simultaneously using a multidimensional approach to assess fidelity (Dane & Schneider, 1998, Odom et al., 2010; Power et al., 2005).”