The revised self‐leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self‐leadership

By Jeffery D. Houghton, Christopher P. Neck. 2002

599 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08cf014f96989e69c84dd1c9090736d649cf44e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Self-leadership in organizational teams: A multilevel analysis of moderators and mediators (2009, methodology): “Natural reward strategies focus on the enjoyable aspects of a given task and help to discover activities that provide pleasure (Houghton & Neck, 2002; Manz, 1986; Manz & Neck, 2004).”
Self-Leadership: A Multilevel Review (2011, background): “The Houghton and Neck (2002) scales represent a validated measure of self-leadership at the individual level.”
Daily self-management and employee work engagement (2014, unknown): “Self-management strategies consist of self-observation, self-goal setting, self-cueing, self-reward, and self-punishment (Houghton & Neck, 2002).”
Effective Stress Management (2012, unknown): “Published scales exist for each component of our model (e.g., Brief, Burke, George, Robinson, & Webster, 1988; Chen, Gulley, & Eden, 2001; Edwards & Baglioni, 1993; Houghton & Neck, 2002; Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 2002), which should facilitate the testing process.”
Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Moral Judgment: The Role of Followers’ Perceived Accountability and Self-leadership (2014, methodology): “We selected a subset of six self-leadership questions form Houghton et al. (2012) and Houghton and Neck (2002) that represent the self-leadership dimensions of goal setting, self-observation, self-reward, constructive self-criticism, and evaluating beliefs and assumptions and modified them to…”
Explaining factors affecting individual innovation: The case of producer group members in Thailand (2012, methodology): “Self-leadership The scale to measure a group member’s self-leadership was adapted from the self-leadership questionnaire developed and validated by Houghton and Neck (2002). The scale contained seven items, measuring the individual’s leading oneself through the use of specified sets of behavioral an”
A cross‐cultural perspective of self‐leadership (2006, background): “constructive thought strategies ( Houghton and Neck, 2002”
Two decades of self‐leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities (2006, background): “More recently, a Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire (RSLQ; Houghton and Neck, 2002) has been presented and has shown a greater degree of reliability and construct validity than the earlier SLQ.”
Employee adaptive performance and job satisfaction during organizational crisis: the role of self-leadership (2018, methodology): “Self-leadership was measured using 21 items from the Revised Self-leadership Questionnaire (Houghton & Neck, 2002), adapted and validated by Marques-Quinteiro et al. (2012).”
Leading yourself and leading others: Linking self-leadership to transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership (2013, background): “Three primary strategy dimensions, with more narrowly defined subfacets, constitute the self-leadership domain (Houghton & Neck, 2002 ): (1) behaviour-focused strategies (self-goal setting, self-reward, self-punishment, self-observation, self-cueing), (2) natural reward strategies (ie, generati”