Self-Leadership: A Multilevel Review
By G. Stewart, Stephen H. Courtright, Charles C. Manz. 2011
418 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/561a8022e5bf4199e887801141f2d51266a240f9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Daantje Derks
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- T. Beehr
- Minseop Kim
- M. Tims
- Kimberley Breevaart
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Daantje Derks
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- M. Tims
- Kimberley Breevaart
- Ø. Martinsen
- J. Hakanen
Citations in the corpus
- Reviewing Leadership Styles: Overlaps and the Need for a New ‘Full‐Range’ Theory (2017, neutral): “There is still a need to develop an accepted measure for distributed leadership at the team level (Stewart et al. 2011).”
- Who takes the lead? A multi-source diary study on leadership, work engagement, and job performance (2016, background): “According to the most recent review on self-leadership (Stewart et al., 2011), over the last three decades, only 10 studies have examined how self-leadership is related to individual- Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz.”
- Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Moral Judgment: The Role of Followers’ Perceived Accountability and Self-leadership (2014, background): “However, active reasoning is required to apply self-leadership focused on ethics (Neck and Houghton 2006; Stewart et al. 2011).”
- The what, why, and how of spirituality in the workplace revisited: a 14-year update and extension (2016, background): “Self-leadership is a process involving specific sets of behavioral and cognitive strategies that individuals can use to shape their behavior and thought processes to more effectively influence themselves (Manz 1986; Neck and Houghton 2006; Stewart, Courtright, and Manz 2011).”
- Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance (2014, background): “Helping employees to lead themselves creates a more robust, flexible, and dynamic leadership infrastructure (Ahearne et al., 2005; Cox et al., 2003; Stewart et al., 2011).”
- Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale (2014, background): “Self-leadership is, however, not a sufficient substitute for external leadership, and Stewart, Courtright, and Manz (2011) identified EL as an important external factor that facilitates employees’ self-influencing skills.”
- Employee adaptive performance and job satisfaction during organizational crisis: the role of self-leadership (2018, background): “Accumulating theoretical and empirical contributions suggest that self-leadership may be positively related with employee’s adaptation in the workplace (e.g., Barber, Bailey, & Justice, 2018; Hauschildt & Konradt, 2012; Manz, 1986; MarquesQuinteiro & Curral, 2012; Marques-Quinteiro et al., 2015; Nec”
- Leading yourself and leading others: Linking self-leadership to transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership (2013, methodology): “Indeed, self-leadership was originally conceived as a substitute for formal leadership (Manz & Sims, 1980 ), and Stewart, Courtright, and Manz ( 2011 ) see self-leadership and so-called “external” leadership inextricably intertwined.”