F. D. de Wit

Sociology and Political Science · 2012–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 14 researchers and is trusted by 10 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 68 citations into it; #7,368 of 22,756 by trust here, #5,224 by citations
• Social Psychology — 57 citations into it; #5,042 of 15,694 by trust here, #4,311 by citations
• Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 31 citations into it
• Gender Studies — 28 citations into it; #1,564 of 4,924 by trust here, #1,009 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 6 citations into it
• Strategy and Management — 6 citations into it

Whom F. D. de Wit trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Carsten K. W. De Dreu
2. Karen A. Jehn
3. Kristopher J Preacher
4. Leslie A. DeChurch
5. Xiao-Hua Zhou
6. Ann Mooney
7. M. Marks
8. Dean Tjosvold
9. C. D. De Dreu
10. W. Viechtbauer

Who trusts F. D. de Wit overall

1. Thomas A. O'Neill
2. Patrícia L. Costa
3. B. Nijstad
4. A. Passos
5. Mayowa T. Babalola
6. Lorenzo Bizzi
7. Natalie J. Allen
8. Floor Berger-Selman
9. Nicola Breugst
10. Matthew J. W. McLarnon

Papers from F. D. de Wit's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers F. D. de Wit trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups
2. A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
3. When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams
4. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models (Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers)
5. Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
6. Handbook of Social Psychology
7. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
8. The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
9. MAXIMIZING THE BENEFITS OF TASK CONFLICT: THE ROLE OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
10. Don't Take It Personally: Exploring Cognitive Conflict as a Mediator of Affective Conflict

Their papers

• The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. (2012) — 1,158 citations
• Social power makes the heart work more efficiently: Evidence from cardiovascular markers of challenge and threat (2012) — 112 citations
• Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict (2013) — 175 citations