Andrew Li

Sociology and Political Science · with Bagger · 2005–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 110 researchers and is trusted by 33 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 195 citations into it; #2,354 of 22,756 by trust here, #3,012 by citations
• Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 187 citations into it; #2,466 of 8,741 by trust here, #2,241 by citations
• Social Psychology — 141 citations into it; #4,244 of 15,694 by trust here, #4,240 by citations
• Gender Studies — 80 citations into it; #4,199 of 4,924 by trust here, #1,647 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 30 citations into it; #1,066 of 8,024 by trust here, #4,166 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 27 citations into it; #832 of 3,868 by trust here, #3,026 by citations
• Strategy and Management — 25 citations into it
• Management Science and Operations Research — 20 citations into it

Whom Andrew Li trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. J. Colquitt
2. Quinetta Roberson
3. Mark G. Ehrhart
4. R. Henson
5. B. Thompson
6. Stefanie E. Naumann
7. Tammy D. Allen
8. Russell S. Cropanzano
9. D. Rupp
10. John C. Caruso

Who trusts Andrew Li overall

1. Claire M. Hart
2. Frank L. Schmidt
3. Alexander M. Czopp
4. Susan Sprecher
5. D. L. Ferris
6. Gale M. Lucas
7. J. Bagger
8. Fred Walumbwa
9. In-Sue Oh
10. S. Aryee

Papers from Andrew Li's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Andrew Li trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
2. Inequity In Social Exchange
3. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
4. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
5. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. (Psychological methods)
6. Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research
7. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.
8. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
9. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
10. The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis

Their papers

• Using the BIDR to Distinguish the Effects of Impression Management and Self-Deception on the Criterion Validity of Personality Measures: A Meta-Analysis (2006) — 146 citations
• Do East Asians Respond More/Less Strongly to Organizational Justice than North Americans? A Meta-Analysis (2009) — 143 citations
• Peer Justice and Teamwork Process (2011) — 93 citations
• How Does Supervisory Family Support Influence Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors? A Social Exchange Perspective (2014) — 218 citations
• Tackling the Problem of Construct Proliferation (2016) — 370 citations
• The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) (2007) — 194 citations
• Being important matters: The impact of work and family centralities on the family-to-work conflict–satisfaction relationship (2012) — 90 citations
• How much do you value your family and does it matter? The joint effects of family identity salience, family-interference-with-work, and gender (2008) — 161 citations
• The influence of leadership behavior on employee work-family outcomes: A review and research agenda (2017) — 92 citations
• Fairness at the Group Level: Justice Climate and Intraunit Justice Climate (2009) — 272 citations
• Predicting Asian international students’ sociocultural adjustment: A test of two mediation models (2005) — 250 citations