The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR)

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Thinking Well of African Americans: Measuring Complimentary Stereotypes and Negative Prejudice (2006, methodology): “To examine potential social desirability biases of the CSNP, participants also completed the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR: Paulhus, 1998).”
Controlling social desirability bias (2018, background): “Support for these subcomponents is mixed (Kovacic, Galic, & Jerneic, 2014; Lanyon & Carle, 2007; Li & Bagger, 2007) and additional subgroups have been formed.”
The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16) (2015, methodology): “Although we would have preferred to maintain high reliabilities (α ≥ .70), previous research has demonstrated the internal consistency of both SDE and IM is typically below or around .70 (Li & Bagger, 2007).”
It's only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose (2014, methodology): “We expected this manipulation to influence participants’ responses to measures of fear of self-disclosure (Carleton, Collimore, McCabe, & Antony, 2011) and impression management (Li & Bagger, 2007), which were taken immediately after the interview.”
Compassionate love for close others and humanity (2005, methodology): “We examined the correlation of the scores on the two forms of the Compassionate Love scale with the two dimensions of the Paulhus (1991) Inventory of Desirable Responding.”