Kristen L. McMaster

Developmental and Educational Psychology · 2005–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 37 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Kristen L. McMaster trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Lynn S. Fuchs
  2. Douglas Fuchs
  3. J. Torgesen
  4. R. Gersten
  5. D. Speece
  6. S. Vaughn
  7. Theodore J. Christ
  8. S. Deno
  9. L. Case
  10. Stephanie Al Otaiba

Who trusts Kristen L. McMaster overall

  1. Michael A. Hebert
  2. Catherine T. Goffreda
  3. Sarah E. Carlson
  4. Douglas Fuchs
  5. S. R. Powell
  6. M. Burns
  7. Panayiota Kendeou
  8. Lynn S. Fuchs
  9. James Clyde DiPerna
  10. Nadine Spörer

Papers from Kristen L. McMaster's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Kristen L. McMaster trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Intensive Remedial Instruction for Children with Severe Reading Disabilities (Journal of Learning Disabilities)
  2. Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters
  3. Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy
  4. Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies to Students With Learning Disabilities: A Review of Research
  5. Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy Intervention
  6. Increasing the Intensity of Intervention in Kindergarten and First Grade
  7. Prediction of Reading Comprehension: Relative Contributions of Word Recognition, Language Proficiency, and Other Cognitive Skills Can Depend on How Comprehension Is Measured
  8. Response to Instruction as a Means of Identifying Students with Reading/Learning Disabilities
  9. Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension
  10. Classification in Context: An Alternative Approach to Identifying Early Reading Disability.

Their papers