Simple but complex: components of the simple view of reading across grade levels

By J. Tilstra, Kristen L. McMaster, Paul van den Broek, Panayiota Kendeou, David N. Rapp. 2009

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8f4ae556ba4bb84d4a723b56f016a12a4f2182e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

A Cross-Linguistic, Longitudinal Study of the Foundations of Decoding and Reading Comprehension Ability (2019, neutral): “…and syntactic skills, which have emerged as independent predictors of reading comprehension in some studies (e.g., Cain, Oakhill, & Bryant, 2004; Clarke, Snowling, Trulove, & Hulme, 2010; Cutting & Scarborough, 2006; Muter, Hulme, Snowling, & Stevenson, 2004; Savage, 2006; Tilstra et al., 2009).”
The Components of the Simple View of Reading: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2012, background): “…is statistically controlled (Braze, Tabor, Shankweiler, & Mencl, 2007; Goff et al., 2005; Ouellette & Beers, 2010; Seigneuric & Ehrlich, 2005; Tilstra et al., 2009), at least for children past the early stages of learning to read (Sénéchal, Ouellette, & Rodney, 2006; Verhoeven & van…”
Decoding and Reading Comprehension: A Test of the Decoding Threshold Hypothesis (2019, background): “For example, in a study of students from Grade 4, 7, and 9, Tilstra et al. (2009) found that verbal proficiency (measured with a vocabulary definition task) and reading fluency significantly predicted reading comprehension after decoding and linguistic comprehension were controlled.”
The role of morphological awareness in reading achievement among young Chinese-speaking English language learners: a longitudinal study (2011, background): “As children become more experienced readers, the variance in reading comprehension explained by word reading is expected to decrease (e.g., Tilstra, McMaster, van den Broek, Kendeou, & Rapp, 2009 ).”
The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading (2021, background): “…vocabulary predicted variance in reading ability above and beyond measures of SVR components in many studies (Nation & Snowling, 2004; Ouellette & Beers, 2010; Tilstra, McMaster, van den Broek, Kendeou, & Rapp, 2009; Verhoeven & van Leeuwe, 2008), although not all of them (Braze et al., 2016).”
Fluency Has a Role in the Simple View of Reading (2013, background): “Evidence provided by Cutting and Scarborough (2006) and Tilstra et al. (2009) suggests that a broader view of linguistic comprehension results in capturing more variance in reading comprehension.”
The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies? (2011, methodology): “We recommend that future research on this topic adopts methods such as the one adopted in a recent meta-analysis of Su and Reeve (2011) and reports separate analyses of studies that fit lenient criteria and, additionally, analyses of a smaller sample of studies that meet strict inclusion criteria.”