Scaling Up an Early Reading Program: Relationships Among Teacher Support, Fidelity of Implementation, and Student Performance Across Different Sites and Years
By M. Stein, M. Berends, Douglas Fuchs, Kristen L. McMaster, Laura M. Sáenz, Loulee Yen, Lynn S. Fuchs, Donald L. Compton. 2008
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a7c01adcd58ce759216687cb5723a61a752cb5c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- E. Hochberg
- Laura Desimone
- Andrew C. Porter
- L. J. Johnson
- Robert Schwartz
- M. Stoolmiller
- Michael R. Harwell
- Brandon LeBeau
Citations in the corpus
- Formal and Informal Mentoring (2014, background): “This aspect of organizational context is largely influenced by student characteristics such as the extent to which they are English Language Learners or traditionally low-achieving students (e.g., M. L. Stein et al., 2008).”
- Student Eligibility for a Free Lunch as an SES Measure in Education Research (2010, methodology): “An examination of the education research literature shows that a variety of variables have served as SES measures, including dwelling value neighborhood quality (Montague, 1964); ethnicity (Burkhead, Fox, & Holland, 1967); parent income (Worley & Story, 1967); teacher salaries (Raymond, 1968); paren”
- Balancing Fidelity with Flexibility and Fit: What Do We Really Know about Fidelity of Implementation in Schools? (2013, background): “Although fidelity has been found to positively predict student outcomes (Al Otaiba & Fuchs, 2006; Carroll et al., 2007; Durlak & DuPre, 2008; Kaderavek & Justice, 2010; Stein et al., 2008), this relationship has not been consistently demonstrated.”