Sarah Gielen

Education · 2003–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 22 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Sarah Gielen trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Dominique Sluijsmans
  2. Ineke van den Berg
  3. P. Miller
  4. Nigel K. L. Pope
  5. Kwangsu Cho
  6. Keith Topping
  7. Paul Orsmond
  8. Wilfried Admiraal
  9. S. Dierick
  10. Hidetoshi Saito

Who trusts Sarah Gielen overall

  1. Yong Wu
  2. Lois R. Harris
  3. Anna Planas Lladó
  4. Jamal Hamed Jahin
  5. Ernesto Panadero
  6. Filip Dochy
  7. Marlies Baeten
  8. Judith T. M. Gulikers
  9. J. Tai
  10. Christian D. Schunn

Papers from Sarah Gielen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Sarah Gielen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views
  2. The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  3. Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
  4. Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs
  5. Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students
  6. Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility
  7. Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice
  8. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
  9. The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  10. Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: effects on performance and perceptions

Their papers