J. Tai
Education · with Boud · 2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 11 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Education — 65 citations into it; #8,168 of 11,309 by trust here, #4,981 by citations
- Developmental and Educational Psychology — 11 citations into it
Whom J. Tai trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- David Boud
- Ernesto Panadero
- David J. Nicol
- Henk G. Schmidt
- G. Joughin
- D. Carless
- Sarah Gielen
- Keith Topping
- N. Falchikov
- M. Vaismoradi
Who trusts J. Tai overall
Papers from J. Tai's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Tai trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
- Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
- The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
- Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
- Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs
- Rethinking assessment in higher education : learning for the longer term
- The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review.
- Reframing assessment as if learning were important
- How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2.
- Developing sustainable feedback practices
Their papers
- Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education (2018) — 196 citations
- Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education : Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work (2018) — 116 citations
- Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement? (2018) — 92 citations
- Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) — 637 citations