Paul Orsmond

Education · 2000–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 16 researchers and is trusted by 28 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Paul Orsmond trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. B. Crisp
  2. D. Carless
  3. David J. Nicol
  4. M. Weaver
  5. Neil Duncan
  6. C. Glover
  7. M. Price
  8. Velda McCune
  9. C. Rust
  10. S. Merry

Who trusts Paul Orsmond overall

  1. D. Carless
  2. Nigel K. L. Pope
  3. Maddalena Taras
  4. Sarah Gielen
  5. Yuh-Mei Chen
  6. A. Jonsson
  7. David Boud
  8. Graham Hendry
  9. Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
  10. Ken Hyland

Papers from Paul Orsmond's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Paul Orsmond trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
  2. Differing perceptions in the feedback process
  3. The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning
  4. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses
  5. Improving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes
  6. Comments on Essays: Do students understand what tutors write?
  7. Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice
  8. The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  9. The development of students’ ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses
  10. The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment

Their papers