Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Peer assessment without assessment criteria (2014, background): “…is varied (Falchikov and Goldfinch 2000), and literature reviews (Boud, Cohen and Sampson 1999; Dochy, Segers and Sluijsmans 1999; Falchikov and Goldfinch 2000; Gielen et al. 2011; Kollar and Fischer 2010; Topping 2003) have identified design principles that appear to improve students’ performance.”
Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation (2014, unknown): “It is widely acknowledged that peer assessment has the potential to be a valuable and effective education tool (Ballantyne et al., 2002; Falchikov, 2005; Gielen et al., 2011).”
Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018, methodology): “Sadler also suggested that an additional method for developing this capability was peer review or assessment, which was also taken up by Gielen et al. (2011).”