Charles Hulme

Developmental and Educational Psychology · 2000–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 19 papers; trusts 42 researchers and is trusted by 50 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Charles Hulme trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Anne Castles
  2. Torkel Klingberg
  3. Susanne M. Jaeggi
  4. M. Caravolas
  5. M. Kane
  6. M. Snowling
  7. K. Cain
  8. R. Engle
  9. Charles A. Perfetti
  10. Max Coltheart

Who trusts Charles Hulme overall

  1. Nelson Cowan
  2. Thomas S. Redick
  3. M. Melby‐Lervåg
  4. Gene P. Ouellette
  5. K. Cain
  6. Klaus Oberauer
  7. Nash Unsworth
  8. Macarena Silva
  9. M. Snowling
  10. K. Dahlin

Papers from Charles Hulme's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Charles Hulme trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Working memory
  2. When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer.
  3. Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. (Developmental Science)
  4. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  5. Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  6. Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? (Cognition)
  7. The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)
  8. Training of Working Memory in Children With ADHD (Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology)
  9. Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: evidence from a longitudinal study. (Developmental Psychology)
  10. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)

Their papers