Gene P. Ouellette

Developmental and Educational Psychology · 2006–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 33 researchers and is trusted by 51 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Gene P. Ouellette trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Mark S. Seidenberg
  2. Michael W. Harm
  3. L. Ehri
  4. M. Sénéchal
  5. Michael S. Vitevitch
  6. Max Coltheart
  7. B. Hagtvet
  8. Kate Nation
  9. James L. McClelland
  10. K. Cain

Who trusts Gene P. Ouellette overall

  1. Athanassios Protopapas
  2. Y. Kim
  3. C. Patrick Proctor
  4. Fataneh Farnia
  5. James Milton
  6. Panagiotis G. Simos
  7. Elena Florit
  8. L. Hemphill
  9. Georgios D. Sideridis
  10. James S. Kim

Papers from Gene P. Ouellette's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Gene P. Ouellette trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
  2. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
  3. Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? (Cognition)
  4. Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. (Developmental Psychology)
  5. Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: evidence from a longitudinal study. (Developmental Psychology)
  6. Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy
  7. Working memory
  8. Text comprehension and its relation to coherence and cohesion in children's fictional narratives
  9. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines)
  10. Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. (Psychology Review)

Their papers