Oscillator-based memory for serial order.
By Gordon D. A. Brown, Tim Preece, Charles Hulme. Psychology Review, 2000
740 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4bb5276f5cc16ac43d7796ea5b7cdb19f7b95d6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- R. Engle
- Nash Unsworth
- Matthew Botvinick
- Klaus Oberauer
- Michael E. Hasselmo
- Michael J. Kahana
- Marc W Howard
- Hsuan-Yu Lin
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Klaus Oberauer
- R. Engle
- Nash Unsworth
- Matthew Botvinick
- Nelson Cowan
- Michael J. Kahana
- Neil Burgess
- Hsuan-Yu Lin
In Information Systems
- Klaus Oberauer
- Nash Unsworth
- R. Engle
- Michael J. Kahana
- David C. Plaut
- Matthew Botvinick
- Marc W Howard
- Neil Burgess
Citations in the corpus
- A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences (2006, methodology): “The Burgess and Hitch (1999) model makes a number of novel predictions about sequence learning. One is that learning will be sensitive to experimental manipulations that affect the context/timing signal such as temporal grouping. In contrast, manipulations that have their effect on the phoneme nodes”
- Interference-Based Forgetting in Verbal Short-Term Memory. (2008, methodology): “SOB incorporates a positional marker for each list position, as is frequently assumed by models of memory (e.g., Brown, Preece, & Hulme, 2000; Burgess & Hitch, 1999).”
- A formal model of capacity limits in working memory (2006, background): “In serial recall, for example, each item is often assumed to be linked to a segment on a temporal or positional context representation (for models along this line see, e.g., Brown, Preece, & Hulme, 2000; Burgess & Hitch, 1999).”
- The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. (2007, background): “Consistent with other views of temporal– contextual retrieval (e.g., G. D. A. Brown et al., 2000; Glenberg et al., 1980, 1983), there are three important assumptions: (a) at encoding, items are associated with various contextual elements that change at different rates, (b) at retrieval, items are…”
- A temporal–contextual retrieval account of complex span: An analysis of errors (2006, methodology): “Indeed, several studies examining simple span tasks have shown that an examination of error responses can be extremely important in constraining theories of immediate memory (e.g., Brown et al., 2000; Henson, 1998), as well as demonstrating important individual, developmental, and group difference”
- Working memory: looking back and looking forward (2003, background): “interpretations assume that each item forms a cue or stimulus for the following item,with the result that once the initial item is activated,the sequence runs off relatively automatically 31,32 .”
- A temporal ratio model of memory. (2007, methodology): “In the case of memory for serial order, probed recall, serial recall, and order reconstruction tasks all show a tendency for items that are not recalled in their correct positions to be recalled in nearby positions (see G. D. A. Brown et al., 2000, for a review).”
- Understanding serial position curves in short-term recognition and recall. (2003, neutral): “The idea of temporal distinctiveness theories (Brown et al., 2000; Burgess & Hitch, 1999; Glenberg, Bradley, Kraus, & Renzaglia, 1983) is that successive events are associated with a continually changing context representation.”