Stephen R. Burgess

Developmental and Educational Psychology · 2000–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 28 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Stephen R. Burgess trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. K. Stanovich
  2. C. Lonigan
  3. R. Dumont
  4. C. McBride-Chang
  5. J. R. García
  6. K. Cain
  7. Erica Scharrer
  8. Frances Conners
  9. Jason L. Anthony
  10. Karen E. Dill

Who trusts Stephen R. Burgess overall

  1. Frank Niklas
  2. Y. Kim
  3. Minna Torppa
  4. Jean-Noël Foulin
  5. Caroline Cohrssen
  6. M. Schneider
  7. C. Lonigan
  8. Anna-Maija Poikkeus
  9. M. Sénéchal
  10. C. Tayler

Papers from Stephen R. Burgess's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Stephen R. Burgess trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Prediction of Reading Comprehension: Relative Contributions of Word Recognition, Language Proficiency, and Other Cognitive Skills Can Depend on How Comprehension Is Measured
  2. Can the Simple View Deal with the Complexities of Reading
  3. THE COMPONENT MODEL OF READING: SIMPLE VIEW OF READING MADE A LITTLE MORE COMPLEX
  4. The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
  5. Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. (Developmental Psychology)
  6. On the malleability of automatic attitudes: combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  7. Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading.
  8. Popular Video Games: Quantifying the Presentation of Violence and Its Context
  9. The effect of video game violence on physiological desensitization to real-life violence.
  10. Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)

Their papers