On the malleability of automatic attitudes: combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals.

By Nilanjana Dasgupta, A. Greenwald. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001

1,167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b63be4eee080e55333e2b1eca655fbdaaac6b1d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by re-defining the category labels (2004, background): “The finding of an elimination, but no reversal, of the pro-White IAT effect in the atypical IAT is consistent with Dasgupta and Greenwald s (2001) finding of reduced pro-White IAT effect following exposure to atypical exemplars.”
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. (2006, background): “previously noted, Dasgupta and Greenwald (2001) have shown that implicit prejudice against African Americans decreased when participants were previously presented with pictures of admired Black and disliked White individuals.”
Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America (2002, background): “In a recent article, De Houwer (2001) argued that while the IAT is sensitive to category evaluations, this task is insensitive to the particular exemplars used to represent each category.”
Why researchers should think "real-time": A cognitive rationale. (2012, background): “For example, Dasgupta and Greenwald (2001) found that exposure to pictures of liked African Americans and disliked European Americans resulted in shifts on a subsequent IAT that paralleled previously observed effects of exposure to liked or disliked exemplars on explicit measures of attitudes…”
Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength. (2007, background): “Such manipulations have involved exposure to movie clips that depicted Blacks at a harmonious family event versus an argumentative, gang-related scene (Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 2001), presentation of a series of either admired Black individuals and disliked Whites or disliked Blacks and admired Wh”
A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. (2002, background): “Dasgupta and Greenwald (2001) demonstrated that exposure to admirable exemplars of stigmatized categories (African American and elderly) reduced implicit negativity toward those categories.”
The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: strengths and limitations. (2002, background): “For instance, Dasgupta and Greenwald (2001) assessed racial attitudes by asking participants to classify first names as typical of Black (e.”
Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations (2004, background): “Just as implicit attitudes have, in recent years, been shown to be remarkably malleable (e.g., Blairet al., 2001; Dasgupta and Greenwald, 2001; Wittenbrink P1: KEE Social Justice Research [sjr] pp1205-sore-486738 April 29, 2004 22:39 Style file version Nov 28th, 2002 158 Dasgupta et al., 2001a; for…”
Intervening in the Media's Influence on Stereotypes of Race and Ethnicity: The Role of Media Literacy Education (2015, methodology): “…to counterstereotypic exemplars in the media can have a positive effect on intergroup relations (Bodenhausen, Schwarz, Bless, & Waenke, 1995; Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001; Mastro & Tukachinsky, 2011; Power, Murphy, & Coover, 1996; Ramasubramanian, 2007, 2011, 2015; Ramasubramanian & Oliver,…”
TARGET ARTICLE: On Building a Better Process Model: It's Not Only How Many, but Which Ones and By Which Means? (2006, positive): “Indeed, among the recent spate of research showing the apparent ease of changing implicit attitudes (e.g., Blair, Ma, & Lenton, 2001; Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001; Kawakami, Dovidio, Moll, Hermsen, & Russin, 2000; Rudman, Ashmore, & Gary, 2001), we suspect that, in many cases, it has been a matter of…”
Mindfulness Meditation Reduces Implicit Age and Race Bias (2014, background): “…have been shown to occur as a result of evaluative conditioning (Olson & Fazio, 2006), exposing individuals to positive out-group exemplars (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001), and taking a college course that focuses on multicultural issues, taught by an African American professor (Rudman,…”
No Place for Nostalgia in Science: A Response to Arkes and Tetlock (2004, methodology): “For example, consider the following sets of experiments: (a) Dasgupta and Greenwald (2001) found that exposure to admired Blacks and disliked Whites led to a reduction in the typical race IAT effect for up to 24 hr; (b) Lowery, Hardin, and Sinclair (2001) demonstrated reduced implicit prejudice…”
Implicit Behavioral Mimicry: Investigating the Impact of Group Membership (2006, background): “related, implicit and explicit attitudes are at least partially separate (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Karpinski & Hilton, 2001) and that they may have independent power in explaining behavior ( Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001; Karpinski & Hilton, 2001).”
Mindfulness and De-Automatization (2013, background): “However, de-automatization through priming or hypnosis has problems with durability and realworld application, because the effects of priming and hypnosis tend to be short-lived (e.g., Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001).”