Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon.
By Brian K. Payne, Larry L. Jacoby, A. Lambert, Michael, Keith Payne. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
1,069 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5786f2dcefa2ed42ae6e642add36279809b53e28
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- David M. Amodio
- Jeffrey W. Sherman
- Eric Mandelbaum
- Bertram Gawronski
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- Joshua Correll
- T. Gendler
- O. Govorun
In Social Psychology
- Bertram Gawronski
- David M. Amodio
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- Galen Bodenhausen
- John F. Dovidio
- Brian K. Payne
- A. Greenwald
- J. Richeson
In Sociology and Political Science
- Bertram Gawronski
- David M. Amodio
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- A. Greenwald
- John F. Dovidio
- Galen Bodenhausen
- John T. Jost
- Brian A. Nosek
Citations in the corpus
- Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons (2002, methodology): “However, the most notable aspect of Payne (2001) was use of process dissociation to show that the biasing effect of race was isolated in the automatic, rather than the controlled, component. (We shall describe below in more detail the manner in which process dissociation is able to yield this kind o”
- The social neuroscience of intergroup relations (2008, methodology): “To do this, we recorded participants’ brain activity as they completed the weapons identification task (Payne, 2001; see below), from which we could derive specific ERPs that reflect the engagement of conflict-related ACC activity on different trial types.”
- The Numbers Don’t Speak for Themselves: Racial Disparities and the Persistence of Inequality in the Criminal Justice System (2018, background): “Evidence of racial disparities in the criminal justice system, then, may activate implicit stereotypical associations linking Blackness with crime, violence, threat, and aggression (Correll, Park, Judd, & Wittenbrink, 2002; Eberhardt, Goff, Purdie, & Davies, 2004; Payne, 2001; Richeson & Trawalter, ”
- Eye-Gaze Direction Modulates Race-Related Amygdala Activity (2008, background): “Furthermore, Black men are strongly associated with violent crime (Correll, Park, Judd, & Wittenbrink, 2002; Eberhardt, Goff, Purdie, & Davies, 2004; Payne, 2001) and angry facial expressions of emotion (Ackerman et al.”
- Alief in Action (and Reaction) (2008, background): “So, for example, White subjects primed with images of Black faces tend to be faster to identify an ambiguous image as a gun, and more likely to misidentify a (non-gun) tool as a gun ( Payne, 2001 .)”
- Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach (2005, background): “Studies within the stereotyping literature have suggested that such responses tend to be rather automatic (Dasgupta et al., 2000), and are thus supported by an ‘accessibility bias’ that is under limited conscious control (Payne, 2001; Payne et al., 2002).”
- Dual Process Th eories (2013, methodology): “Using the PD model, Payne (2001) calculated separate estimates reflecting participants’ ability to correctly identify guns and harmless objects (reflected in the model’s C parameter) and racial bias in guessing the nature of the target stimulus when participants were unable to identify the stimulus…”
- Black Americans' Implicit Racial Associations And Their Implications for Intergroup Judgment (2003, methodology): “…techniques for measuring implicit associations in relation to race, from priming procedures (e.g., Fazio et al., 1995; Gaertner & McLaughlin, 1983; Payne, 2001; Perdue, Dovidio, Gurtman, & Tyler, 1990; Wittenbrink et al., 1997) to considering how word fragments are completed (Gilbert & Hixon,…”
- Ego—Depletion and Prejudice: Separating Automatic and Controlled Components (2006, methodology): “Previous research has documented that this decision can be biased by race (Correll at al., 2002; Greenwald, Oakes, & Hoffman, 2003; Payne, 2001).”
- Attitude, Inference, Association: On the Propositional Structure of Implicit Bias (2016, methodology): “…Procedure (AMP; Payne 2009); the Go/No-Go Association Task (GNAT; Nosek and Banaji 2001); the Sorting Paired Feature Task (SPFT; Bar-Anan, et al. 2009); the Weapon Identification Task (Payne 2001, Correll et al. 2002); and the Affective Lexical Priming Score (ALPS; Lebrecht et al. 2009).”
- Unconscious Racism: A Concept in Pursuit of a Measure (2008, background): “Thus, although personal control represents an important area of research in the study of racial bias (see Payne 2001, Correll et al. 2007), lack of control does not provide a viable line for delineating between consciously and unconsciously held racist attitudes.”
- Intergroup Perception and Cognition: An Integrative Framework for Understanding the Causes and Consequences of Social Categorization (2017, background): “…outgroups relative to ingroups has been associated with a variety of responses, including support for pro-Black government policies and the criterion to shoot Blacks in the Payne (2001) weapons task (Craemer et al., 2013; Kenworthy, Barden, Diamond, & del Carmen, 2011; Woodcock & Monteith, 2013).”
- Examining Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests (2015, neutral): “…domains ranging from employment decisions (Krieger & Fiske, 2006), juror decisions (Blair, Judd, & Chapleau, 2004; Eberhardt, Davies, Purdie-Vaughns, & Johnson, 2006; Eberhardt, Goff, Purdie, & Davies, 2004), and shoot/do not shoot decisions Correll, Park, Judd, & Wittenbrink, 2002; Payne, 2001).”
- Playing With Prejudice: The Prevalence and Consequences of Racial Stereotypes in Video Games (2011, methodology): “…were used to calculate an average RT for each game race/game violence/identification stimulus combination for each of the 39 subjects (26 female and 13 male); the outlying scores below 100 ms or above 1000 ms were excluded because of the known distortion outliers can have on RT data (Payne, 2001).”
- The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm (2008, background): “For example, when instructed to shoot only at targets who carry a gun, US participants revealed a strong bias to shoot more at Black rather than White targets, even though race had no diagnostic relevance (Correll et al., 2002, 2007; see also, Payne, 2001; Plant & Peruche, 2005).”