Jonathan Plucker
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2001–2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 19 papers; trusts 30 researchers and is trusted by 57 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 65 citations into it; #438 of 9,731 by trust here, #323 by citations
- Statistics and Probability — 33 citations into it; #6,943 of 12,932 by trust here, #5,857 by citations
- Social Psychology — 22 citations into it; #3,551 of 15,694 by trust here, #3,409 by citations
- Developmental and Educational Psychology — 17 citations into it; #1,769 of 8,223 by trust here, #1,410 by citations
- Education — 15 citations into it; #10,152 of 11,309 by trust here, #11,030 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 11 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 11 citations into it
- Clinical Psychology — 7 citations into it
Whom Jonathan Plucker trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Matthew T. McBee
- Robert J. Sternberg
- D. Ford
- James C. Kaufman
- Daniele Fanelli
- Joseph S. Renzulli
- R. Beghetto
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- Sasha A. Barab
- John Baer
Who trusts Jonathan Plucker overall
- R. Beghetto
- James C. Kaufman
- Mei-Shiu Chiu
- Baptiste Barbot
- R. Reiter‐Palmon
- Paul J Silvia
- Maciej Karwowski
- Mark A. Runco
- John Baer
- M. K. Gavin
Papers from Jonathan Plucker's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jonathan Plucker trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking
- A Descriptive Analysis of Referral Sources for Gifted Identification Screening by Race and Socioeconomic Status
- Conceptions of Giftedness: From Gifts to Talents: The DMGT as a Developmental Model
- Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)
- Can Only Intelligent People Be Creative? A Meta-Analysis
- Addressing Underrepresentation of Gifted Minority Children Using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT)
- General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured.
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
- CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT
- HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
Their papers
- Looking outside and inside: Self-Concept Development of Gifted Adolescents (2001) — 124 citations
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence: Intelligence and Creativity (2011) — 168 citations
- Facts Are More Important Than Novelty (2014) — 594 citations
- Creativity Through a Lens of Social Responsibility: Implicit Theories of Creativity with Korean Samples (2001) — 91 citations
- Development and Psychometric Integrity of a Measure of Ideational Behavior (2001) — 343 citations
- Advancing Creativity Theory and Research: A Socio‐cultural Manifesto (2020) — 292 citations
- Replication in Criminology and the Social Sciences (2018) — 117 citations
- Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education (2014) — 139 citations
- Identifying and Assessing Creativity as a Component of Giftedness (2012) — 114 citations
- Is Originality in the Eye of the Beholder? Comparison of Scoring Techniques in the Assessment of Divergent Thinking (2011) — 119 citations
- Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way (2009) — 100 citations
- Essentials of Creativity Assessment (2008) — 420 citations
- Critical Issues and Practices in Gifted Education: What the Research Says (2007) — 155 citations
- Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development: The Relationship Among Schooling, Learning, and Creativity: “All Roads Lead to Creativity” or “You Can't Get There from Here”? (2006) — 95 citations
- Predicting Ideational Behavior From Divergent Thinking and Discretionary Time on Task (2006) — 108 citations
- Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research (2004) — 1,683 citations
- Why Creativity Is Domain General, Why It Looks Domain Specific, and Why the Distinction Does Not Matter. (2004) — 360 citations
- We Recruit Them, But Then What? The Educational and Psychological Experiences of Academically Talented Undergraduates (2004) — 117 citations
- Smart People or Smart Contexts? Cognition, Ability, and Talent Development in an Age of Situated Approaches to Knowing and Learning (2002) — 452 citations