Identifying and Assessing Creativity as a Component of Giftedness

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review (2017, methodology): “…as fully representative of an individual’s entire creativity (Baer, 2011, 2016; Batey & Furnham, 2006; Fishkin & Johnson, 1998; Kaufman et al., 2007; Kaufman et al., 2012; Kim, 2006a; Lubart & Guignard, 2004; Runco, 1993, 2008; Runco & Acar, 2012; Torrance & Haensly, 2003; Treffinger et al., 1971;…”
The Psychological Well-Being of Early Identified Gifted Children (2016, unknown): “Although it remains unclear whether creativity can be considered a cause or a consequence of giftedness, we followed the recommendations of Kaufman, Plucker, and Russell (2012) and included it in the current study as an indicator for the multidimensional concept of giftedness.”
Current Perspectives on the Identification and Assessment of Gifted Students (2012, background): “Kaufman, Plucker, and Russell (2012) provide a cogent discourse on the construct of creativity and on the alternative ways to measure creativity.”
Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons (2014, methodology): “This test is a modiﬁed Hebrew version of the Wallach and Kogan (1965) battery of creativity tests (see Kaufman et al., 2012 for a current review of creativity measurements).”