General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured.
By W. Wright
Subfields: Philosophy
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Philosophy
- José Hernandez-Orallo
- Joel Veness
- Shane Legg
- Scott Barry Kaufman
- Ben Goertzel
- R. F. West
- K. Stanovich
- David C. Geary
Citations in the corpus
- On the challenges of learning with inference networks on sparse, high-dimensional data (2017, background): “Factor analysis (FA, Spearman, 1904) is a widely used latent variable model in the applied sciences.”
- Genetics and Intelligence Differences: Five Special Findings (2014, unknown): “It might be argued that it is no longer surprising to demonstrate genetic influence on a behavioural trait, and that it would be more interesting to find a trait that shows no genetic influence.”
- Customer Service Employees’ Behavioral Intentions and Attitudes: An Examination of Construct Validity and a Path Model (2000, methodology): “consistent, they will satisfy the parameters established by the Spearman product rule (Spearman, 1904).”
- Weak and Strong Cross Section Dependence and Estimation of Large Panels (2011, unknown): “To prove this, rst notice that if A;B are two n n complex valued matrices then5 kABk kAk min BB0 1=2 ; (24) kABk kBk min AA0 1=2 : (25) Applying (24)-(25) to [Fz(!0)], we obtain [Fz(!0)] = kFz(!0)k = 1 2 (IN e i!0 ) 1 (IN e0 0) 1 1 2 (IN e i!0 ) 1 min h(IN e0 0) (1)(IN e i!0 ) 1i1=2 1 2 k k min h (”
- The p Factor: One General Psychopathology Factor in the Structure of Psychiatric Disorders? (2014, background): “Nonetheless, the general factor in intelligence (called the g factor) summarizes the observation that individuals who do well on one type of cognitive test tend to do well on all other types of cognitive tests (Deary, 2001; Jensen, 1998; Spearman, 1904).”
- Variational learning for latent Gaussian model of discrete data (2012, methodology): “A similar technique, called factor analysis (FA) [Bartholomew, 1980; Spearman, 1904], is also a special case of LGM.”
- Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders (2009, background): “…argued that the proof of g was independent of test conditions, test procedures, test reliability, homogeneity of the group of people being tested, historical times, geographies, and cultures; he described g as “reproducible at all times, places and manners …” (Spearman, 1904 , p. 50).”
- Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide (2005, background): “One way that this evidence for reliability can be understood is in terms of classical test theory, first proposed by Spearman (1904).”
- Historical increase in the number of factors measured by commercial tests of cognitive ability: Are we overfactoring? (2007, methodology): “Spearman (1904) developed one of the first theories of the structure of intelligence.”
- Meta-learning of Sequential Strategies (2019, background): “Generality is at the heart of IQ tests [Spearman, 1904, Raven, 1936, Urbina, 2011] and the measure of intelligence suggested by Legg and Hutter [2007].”
- Inequality in the Early Cognitive Development of British Children in the 1970 Cohort (2003, unknown): “There is no assumption here that this index identifies any uni-dimensional notion of intelligence such as Spearman’s g, which is central to psychometric studies and has aroused considerable controversy. Charles Spearman, a British psychologist, noted (Spearman, 1904) that people who scored well on i”
- The Big Five and tertiary academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2014, background): “In the same historical time period Charles Spearman published work pointing towards a general intelligence factor (Spearman, 1904), a factor that has since become widely known as the g factor.”
- Complex relationship between multiple measures of cognitive ability and male mating success in satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus (2011, methodology): “Consistent with other studies (Spearman 1904; Plomin 2001; Galsworthy et al. 2005), we constructed g using scores from the first unrotated principal component from a principle component analysis of the six cognitive tasks.”