CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT
By Sharon Bailin. 2002
2,184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Visual Arts and Performing Arts
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84b45cd845376c6a906c6672c3f1f7b2af10c4fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Visual Arts and Performing Arts
- James C. Kaufman
- Paul J Silvia
- John Baer
- R. Reiter‐Palmon
- Maciej Karwowski
- R. Beghetto
- V. Glăveanu
- Adrian Furnham
Citations in the corpus
- Consumer Empowerment Through Internet-Based Co-creation (2009, background): “this seems plausible as creative users and lead users have a higher need to articulate their needs and to transfer their knowledge [2, 127].”
- Team Creative Performance (2013, background): “The hospitality industry is increasingly relying on employee creativity and teamwork for excellence in operations (Amabile 1996; Hon 2011, 2012; Hon and Leung 2011), and organizations of all kinds are encouraging team creativity so they can compete more effectively (Gilson and Shalley 2004; Sundstro”
- Assessing Creativity With Divergent Thinking Tasks: Exploring the Reliability and Validity of New Subjective Scoring Methods (2008, background): “The consensual assessment technique has worked in a wide range of contexts and samples, indicating that the subjective scores have sufficient validity (see Amabile, 1996).”
- Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams (2006, background): “Innovation is both the creative development of novelty and its application to generation of a new product (Amabile, 1996; West, 2002), with areas of expertise held by individuals or teams within organizations accessed and processed to generate innovations (Amabile, 1983; Ford, 1996; Simon, 1986).”
- Entrepreneurship, Subjectivism, and the Resource-Based View: Towards a New Synthesis (2008, positive): “1002/sej By subjectivism, we mean the notion that research in social science, including management, must take account of the facts that individuals hold different preferences, knowledge, and expectations, and more specifi cally, ‘the pre-supposition that the contents of the human mind, and hence dec”
- Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Promotion Focus and Creative Process Engagement (2014, background): “Creativity is a continuum (Amabile 1996) with minor adaptations of existing ideas at the low and radical new ideas at the high end (Perry-Smith and Shalley 2003).”
- Effects of a Creativity Training Program on Divergent Thinking Abilities and Self-Concept in Monolingual and Bilingual Classrooms (2002, background): “For example, although creativity was viewed as being based exclusively on internal factors, recent studies (Amabile, 1996; Csikszentmihalyi, 1996) have shown that the environment also has a strong impact on creative production.”
- Job crafting and job performance: A longitudinal study (2015, background): “Complex and intellectually demanding tasks are found to give rise to feelings of interest and involvement (Amabile, 1996) and therefore likely foster work engagement.”
- A Problem and Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach to Motivate Group Creativity in Engineering Education (2012, positive): “As Amabile [14] suggests, the individuals who under-take a task for its own sake are intrinsically motivated; they perceive themselves as engaging in an activity primarily because of their own interest in it.”
- The Effect of Regulatory Focus on Idea Generation and Idea Evaluation (2011, methodology): “Creativityrelated skills are cognitive style, heuristic use, and working style (Amabile, 1996).”
- Voice, creativity, and big five personality traits: A meta-analysis (2018, background): “Individual creativity promotes organizational effectiveness (Amabile, 1996; Scott & Bruce, 1994; Sung & Choi, 2009) and firm competitiveness and survival in today’s global market (Amabile, 1996; Dayan, Zacca, & Di Benedetto, 2013; Liu, Liao, & Loi, 2012).”
- Creative Thinking Ability: Domain Generality and Specificity (2010, background): “More recently, however, scholars have presented evidence indicating that creative thinking is domainor task-specific and not domain-general, as long believed (Amabile, 1996; Baer, 1998).”
- A "Small-World" Network Model of Cognitive Insight (2005, background): “…are consistent with evidence suggesting that creative people tend to prefer to think in novel ways of their own choosing, tend to be persistent, and tend to be highly motivated by the intrinsic reward of working on a problem they find interesting (Amabile, 1983, 1996; Sternberg & Lubart, 1999).”
- The Contribution of Personality Traits, Motivation, Academic Risk-Taking and Metacognition to the Creative Ability in Mathematics (2015, background): “Creativity may have both general and domain-specific qualities (Amabile, 1996; Baer, 2012; Kaufman & Baer, 2004; Leikin, 2009; Milgram & Livne, 2005; Tan, 2007).”
- Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies (2006, background): “Others have studied children’s creativity with artistic tasks such as drawings of imaginary forests which were rated by a panel of artists [1].”
- Structuring for team success: The interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance (2014, positive): “…as insufficient centralization contributes to inefficiencies in the flow of information, excessive network centralization contributes to (1) an overburdening of the central individuals in the team and (2) elicits the resentment of those relegated to the margins of the network (cf. Amabile, 1996).”